The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Considerations in Geotechnical Engineering
Abstract
The understanding of soil behavior during the last 300 years has centered on mechanical principles, geological processes, and later on, mineralogy and the relevance of colloidal chemistry. More recently, research in biology and earth science has enabled important advances in understanding the crucial involvement of microorganisms in the evolution of the earth, their ubiquitous presence in near surface soils and rocks, and their participation in mediating and facilitating most geochemical reactions. Yet, the effect of biological activity on soil mechanical behavior remains largely underexplored in the geotechnical field. The purposes of this paper are to introduce microbiological concepts, identify and illustrate their potential roles in soils and rocks, and stimulate interest in seeking improved understanding of their importance and potential for advancing the states of knowledge and practice in geotechnical engineering. It is shown that microorganisms play an important part on the formation of many fine grained soils, can alter the behavior of coarse grained soils (including hydraulic conductivity, diffusion and strength), accelerate geochemical reactions by orders of magnitude, promote both weathering and aging, and alter the chemical and mechanical properties of specimens after sampling. While extensive research is needed to delineate the full impact of biomass and biomediated reactions on soil behavior, it is anticipated that a proper understanding of biological principles will lead to improved soil characterization, enhanced understanding of soil behavior, and even alternative geotechnical engineering solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Cited by
DeJong, J. T., Mortensen, B. M., Martinez, B. C., & Nelson, D. C. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.029 · Cited by 1,763
Quantifying Biomediated Ground Improvement by Ureolysis: Large-Scale Biogrout Experiment
van Paassen, L. A., Ghose, R., van der Linden, T. J. M., van der Star, W. R. L., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2010) · Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000382 · Cited by 965
Mechanical Behavior of Sands Treated by Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation
Lin, H., Suleiman, M. T., Brown, D. G., & Kavazanjian, E. (2016) · Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001383 · Cited by 332
Soil strengthening using thermo-gelation biopolymers
Chang, I., Prasidhi, A. K., Im, J., & Cho, G.-C. (2015) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.116 · Cited by 309
Sharma, M., Satyam, N., & Reddy, K. R. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste · doi:10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000548 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, J. K., & Santamarina, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1222-1233
- ISSN
- 1090-0241 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5606
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1222
- OpenAlex
- W2043107788
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Considerations in Geotechnical Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1222
- The paper
- Mitchell, J. K., & Santamarina, J. C. (2005). Biological Considerations in Geotechnical Engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131%3A10(1222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.