Cited by 54Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Research on the Effects of a Tuned Particle Damper on a Viaduct System under Seismic Loads

Yan, Weiming, Xu, Weibing, Wang, Jin, Chen, Yanjiang·2014·Journal of Bridge Engineering

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary design approach for tuned particle dampers for continuous viaducts. A series of shaking table tests of a 1/10-scale model bridge with and without tuned particle dampers was carried out to evaluate the performance of the system and verify the analysis method. An analytical energy method was established to simulate the behavior of the damper using a finite-element model. The experimental and computational results show that the preliminary design method proposed for tuned particle dampers can be a valuable tool in the application of particle damping in controlling the seismic response of bridges. A tuned particle damper can effectively reduce the seismic response of a continuous viaduct. One of the keys to the performance of a tuned particle damper is the excitation intensity. A tuned particle damper has a wider control frequency band than a single tuned mass damper or a single tuned liquid damper. The simplified method is effective in simulating the behavior of the damper using a finite-element model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000525

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Comartin C. D., 1996, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings
  2. Kijewski T. and Kareem A. (1999). “Analysis of full-scale data from a tall building in Boston: Damping estimates.” Proc. 10th ICWE Vol. 1 British Library Board London 679684.
  3. Penzien J., 1993, Dynamics of structures
  4. Soong T. T., 1996, Passive dissipation systems in structural engineering

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Yan, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Professor, College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing Univ. of Technology, 2-301 West Building of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing 100124, China.
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Weibing
Venue
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Published
2014-03
Volume
19
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1084-0702 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5592
OpenAlex
W1965805191
Cited by
54
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Bridge Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
seismic response control, shaking table test, energy method, damper design, excitation intensity, bridge vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review