Cited by 22Construction Project Management and PerformancePublic Procurement and PolicyBIM and Construction Integration

Electronic Procurement Systems Adoption in Construction Procurement: A Global Survey on the Barriers and Strategies from the Developed and Developing Economies

Yevu, Sitsofe Kwame, Yu, Ann Tit Wan, Nani, Gabriel, Darko, Amos, Tetteh, Mershack Opoku·2022·Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

Abstract

With digital technologies providing sustainable avenues for addressing construction problems, electronic procurement systems (EPS) offer viable solutions for transforming construction procurement processes in projects. However, the uptake of EPS has not been as apparent as it should have been due to the complexities of barriers and strategies. Unlike previous studies that focused narrowly on either barriers to or strategies for EPS use, this study aims at examining EPS barriers and strategies from various countries to provide a more comprehensive global perspective regarding EPS implementation. Through an expert survey, 94 procurement experts from different countries evaluated the influences of these barriers and strategies. Subsequently, factor analysis was used to objectively cluster the results from the survey. In effect, six groups of barriers and three groups of strategies were identified. The barrier groups were related to technological usability and evolution, security and unsupportive environment, culture, infrastructure, unethical practices, and financial and skill. For strategies, the groups were related to organizational dynamics, industry technology ecosystem, and innovation adaptation mechanism. Regarding the developed and developing economies categorization, the rank agreement analysis results showed several degrees of disparities and consensus on the influences of barriers and strategies to EPS implementation across the two contexts. In effect, the contextual variabilities in the influences of these barriers and strategies across the two economic contexts are provided for researchers and practitioners to improve their efforts in promoting EPS. This study contributes to EPS knowledge by providing insights on the contextual dynamics of critical barriers and strategies from the developed and developing economies contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002213

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yevu, S. K., Yu, A. T. W., Nani, G., Darko, A., & Tetteh, M. O.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Corresponding author
Yevu, Sitsofe Kwame
Venue
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2022-01
Volume
148
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0733-9364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7862
OpenAlex
W3214137255
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
e-procurement systems, construction procurement, technology adoption barriers, technology adoption strategies, developed and developing countries, organizational culture, infrastructure, unethical practices, organizational dynamics, innovation adaptation, digitalization of construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review