Cited by 37Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Heat Island MitigationHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Urban Catchment Composition on Runoff Temperature

Jones, Matthew P., Hunt, William F., Winston, Ryan J.·2012·Journal of Environmental Engineering

Abstract

Urban runoff adversely impacts cold-water stream environments due to sporadic fluxes of thermally enriched runoff. This adversely impacts tourism in regions that support trout and salmon streams. Research on storm water control measures (SCMs) has shown that meeting the 21°C trout threshold is not consistently feasible with current SCM technologies. Thus, it is important to consider other factors in storm water temperature management, such as catchment characteristics. Median and maximum runoff temperatures from a shaded parking lot were consistently lower than those from a nearby unshaded lot. This suggests the need to implement a tree canopy cover in trout-sensitive catchments. A light-colored chip seal pavement was compared to a traditional hot-mix asphalt pavement; the light-colored chip seal produced median storm water temperatures that were 1.4°C lower than the standard hot-mix asphalt. It was shown that runoff temperature measurement location is critical when evaluating SCM performance, and that underground conveyances can substantially reduce runoff temperature.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000577

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/1352-2310(94)00140-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01597.x · DOI
  4. 10.1139/f77-115 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00354.x · DOI
  6. 10.1139/f77-100 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/hyp.7954 · DOI
  8. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000022 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000227 · DOI
  10. Kieser M. S., 2004, Stormwater thermal enrichment in urban watersheds
  11. 10.1023/A:1017550321076 · DOI
  12. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000172 · DOI
  13. Roseen R., 2011, Examination of thermal impacts from stormwater best management practices
  14. 10.2307/3001968 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000367 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jones, M. P., Hunt, W. F., & Winston, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Hazen and Sawyer (United States) (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Published
2012-12
Volume
138
Issue
12
Pages
1231-1236
ISSN
  • 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7870
OpenAlex
W2056938482
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
tree canopy cover, hot mix asphalt pavement, cold streams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review