The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seismic Protection of Structures with Supplemental Rotational Inertia
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the alternative strategy of suppressing ground-induced vibrations with supplemental rotational inertia. The proposed concept employs a rack-pinion-flywheel system where its resisting force is proportional to the relative acceleration between the vibrating mass and the support of the flywheels. This arrangement, known in the mechanical networks literature as the inerter, complements the traditional supplemental damping and stiffness strategies used for the seismic protection of structures. The paper shows that the seismic protection of structures with supplemental rotational inertia has some unique advantages, particularly in suppressing the spectral displacements of long period structures—a function that is not efficiently achieved with large values of supplemental damping. The paper shows that this happens at the expense of transferring appreciable forces at the support of the flywheels and proceeds by examining to what extent the finite stiffness and damping of the support of the flywheels affects the dynamics of the system. The proposed concept may be attractive for the seismic protection of bridges given that the rack-pinion-flywheel system strategy can accommodate large displacements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter
Smith, M. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2002.803532 · Cited by 1,828
Marian, L., & Giaralis, A. (2014) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007 · Cited by 828
Giaralis, A., & Taflanidis, A. A. (2015) · The University of British Columbia · doi:10.14288/1.0076257 · Cited by 24
Cited by
An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (tmdi)
De Domenico, D., & Ricciardi, G. (2018) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.3011 · Cited by 473
Inerter-based structural vibration control: A state-of-the-art review
Ma, R., Bi, K., & Hao, H. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112655 · Cited by 445
An inerter-enhanced nonlinear energy sink
Javidialesaadi, A., & Wierschem, N. E. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.047 · Cited by 180
Shen, W., Niyitangamahoro, A., Feng, Z., & Zhu, H. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109470 · Cited by 175
De Domenico, D., & Ricciardi, G. (2018) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2234 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Makris, N., & Kampas, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- OpenAlex
- W2497769410
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seismic Protection of Structures with Supplemental Rotational Inertia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001152
- The paper
- Makris, N., & Kampas, G. (2016). Seismic Protection of Structures with Supplemental Rotational Inertia. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.