Cited by 9Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings

Modeling and Validation of a Passive Resettable Stiffness Damper

Walsh, Kenneth K., Sallar, Grace, Steinberg, Eric P.·2017·Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Abstract

The resetting semiactive stiffness damper (RSASD) has been shown to be effective at controlling vibrations in civil structures in the presence of near-field earthquakes. Although it has the advantages of being mechanically simple and relatively inexpensive, the RSASD requires a multicomponent feedback control system consisting of sensors, a microcontroller, a servo valve, and a battery to operate, rendering it less reliable during a seismic event. In the present work, the resetting passive stiffness damper (RPSD) is presented as an improvement to the RSASD, whereby the RSASD feedback control system is replaced by a novel mechanism to achieve resetting of the damper force. The results of laboratory studies on a small-scale RPSD demonstrate that the resetting mechanism performs as proposed. Results of numerical simulations performed for a five-story base-isolated building subject to four benchmark earthquakes indicate that the RPSD is capable of a similar control performance as the RSASD. Furthermore, it is shown that the RPSD dissipates comparable energy to the RSASD using fewer resets for earthquakes characterized by high peak accelerations and high velocity pulses with long periods, i.e., near-field earthquakes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001190

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Walsh et al. presented a resetting passive stiffness damper in line with modification of resetting semi-active stiffness damper where the feedback components of RSASD were substituted by a rack-lever mechanism to attain damper resetting as a function of the applied force.

    “Walsh et al. [75] presented a resetting passive stiffness damper (RPSD) in line with modification of resetting semi-active stiffness damper (RSASD) where the feedback components of RSASD were substituted by a rack-lever mechanism, as illustrated in Fig. 8, to attain damper resetting as a function of the applied force.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, K. K., Sallar, G., & Steinberg, E. P.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Kenneth K.
Venue
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Published
2017-02
Volume
143
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7889
OpenAlex
W2541365557
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Engineering Mechanics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Keywords
passive vibration control, near-field earthquakes, base-isolated buildings, energy dissipation, seismic response control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review