Modeling and Validation of a Passive Resettable Stiffness Damper
Abstract
The resetting semiactive stiffness damper (RSASD) has been shown to be effective at controlling vibrations in civil structures in the presence of near-field earthquakes. Although it has the advantages of being mechanically simple and relatively inexpensive, the RSASD requires a multicomponent feedback control system consisting of sensors, a microcontroller, a servo valve, and a battery to operate, rendering it less reliable during a seismic event. In the present work, the resetting passive stiffness damper (RPSD) is presented as an improvement to the RSASD, whereby the RSASD feedback control system is replaced by a novel mechanism to achieve resetting of the damper force. The results of laboratory studies on a small-scale RPSD demonstrate that the resetting mechanism performs as proposed. Results of numerical simulations performed for a five-story base-isolated building subject to four benchmark earthquakes indicate that the RPSD is capable of a similar control performance as the RSASD. Furthermore, it is shown that the RPSD dissipates comparable energy to the RSASD using fewer resets for earthquakes characterized by high peak accelerations and high velocity pulses with long periods, i.e., near-field earthquakes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Walsh et al. presented a resetting passive stiffness damper in line with modification of resetting semi-active stiffness damper where the feedback components of RSASD were substituted by a rack-lever mechanism to attain damper resetting as a function of the applied force.
“Walsh et al. [75] presented a resetting passive stiffness damper (RPSD) in line with modification of resetting semi-active stiffness damper (RSASD) where the feedback components of RSASD were substituted by a rack-lever mechanism, as illustrated in Fig. 8, to attain damper resetting as a function of the applied force.”
From Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures (2017) · cites this paper as [75]
Cites
Vibration control performance of tuned mass dampers with resettable variable stiffness
Lin, G.-L., Lin, C.-C., Chen, B.-C., & Soong, T.-T. (2015) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.041 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures
Ghaedi, K., Ibrahim, Z., Adeli, H., & Javanmardi, A. (2017) · Journal of Vibroengineering · doi:10.21595/jve.2017.18900 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“[75] presented a resetting passive stiffness damper (RPSD) in line with modification of resetting semi-active stiffness damper (RSASD) where the feedback components of RSASD were substituted by a rack-lever mechanism, as illustrated in Fig.”
Method
- Authors
- Walsh, K. K., Sallar, G., & Steinberg, E. P.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walsh, Kenneth K.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- OpenAlex
- W2541365557
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
- Keywords
- passive vibration control, near-field earthquakes, base-isolated buildings, energy dissipation, seismic response control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review