The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Urban Runoff Mitigation by a Permeable Pavement System over Impermeable Soils
Abstract
The respective runoff from a 200-m2 permeable pavement test site and an adjacent 850-m2 conventional asphalt road catchment in Auckland, New Zealand, was monitored concurrently between 2006 and 2008. Despite installation over relatively impermeable subgrade soils, and on an atypically high slope (6.0–7.4%) and active roadway, the overall hydrologic performance of the permeable pavement was exceptional. Measured discharge from the permeable pavement underdrain demonstrated peak flow (81 storms) comparable to or below modeled predevelopment conditions for most storms, regardless of antecedent conditions, including a 10-year, 24-h annual recurrence interval event. For large events (5% exceedance), underdrain discharge volume was comparable to predevelopment conditions, but it was substantially less than asphalt runoff for all events up to approximately 70% exceedance. The distributions of peak flow and volume were statistically different between the asphalt catchment runoff and the permeable pavement underdrain discharge (0.05 level of significance). Runoff coefficients ranged from 0.29–0.67 for underdrain discharge (10th–90th percentile events), and from 0.41–0.74 when permeable pavement comprises about one-half of an otherwise impervious catchment. Underdrain lag time and hydrograph duration were reminiscent of a vegetated area. Spearman correlation indicated influences of rainfall depth, intensity, and duration on runoff parameters from both catchments, while antecedent moisture condition was correlated to underdrain discharge lag time. Surface infiltration measurement at four permeable pavement sites revealed that surrounding land uses likely have more influence on pavement clogging than does traffic load. Permeable pavements should be given strong consideration as an low impact development source control, and can also mitigate conventional large design storm flows, but care must be taken during installation to ensure proper function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Performance and implementation of low impact development – A review
Eckart, K., McPhee, Z., & Bolisetti, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254 · Cited by 700
The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics
Qin, H.-P., Li, Z.-X., & Fu, G. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026 · Cited by 552
Hydrologic modeling of Low Impact Development systems at the urban catchment scale
Palla, A., & Gnecco, I. (2015) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Fassman, E. A., & Blackbourn, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 475-485
- ISSN
- 1084-0699 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5584
- OpenAlex
- W2063586628
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban Runoff Mitigation by a Permeable Pavement System over Impermeable Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000238
- The paper
- Fassman, E. A., & Blackbourn, S. (2010). Urban Runoff Mitigation by a Permeable Pavement System over Impermeable Soils. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.