Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures

Gandomi, Amir Hossein, Alavi, Amir Hossein, Mirzahosseini, Mohammad Reza, Nejad, Fereidoon Moghadas·2011·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Abstract

Rutting has been considered the most serious distress in flexible pavements for many years. Flow number is an explanatory index for the evaluation of the rutting potential of asphalt mixtures. In this study, a promising variant of genetic programming, namely, gene expression programming (GEP), is utilized to predict the flow number of dense asphalt-aggregate mixtures. The proposed constitutive models relate the flow number of Marshall specimens to the coarse and fine aggregate contents, percentage of air voids, percentage of voids in mineral aggregate, Marshall stability, and Marshall flow. Different correlations were developed using different combinations of the influencing parameters. The comprehensive experimental database used for the development of the correlations was established on the basis of a series of uniaxial dynamic-creep tests conducted in this study. Relative importance values of various predictor variables were calculated to determine their contributions to the flow number prediction. A multiple-least-squares-regression (MLSR) analysis was performed to benchmark the GEP models. For more verification, a subsequent parametric study was carried out, and the trends of the results were confirmed with the results of previous studies. The results indicate that the proposed correlations are effectively capable of evaluating the flow number of asphalt mixtures. The GEP-based formulas are simple, straightforward, and particularly valuable for providing an analysis tool accessible to practicing engineers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Mirzahosseini, M. R., & Nejad, F. M.
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2011-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
248-263
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
OpenAlex
W2096185550
Cited by
311
References
1
FWCI
52.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154
The paper
Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Mirzahosseini, M. R., & Nejad, F. M. (2011). Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.