The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures
Abstract
Rutting has been considered the most serious distress in flexible pavements for many years. Flow number is an explanatory index for the evaluation of the rutting potential of asphalt mixtures. In this study, a promising variant of genetic programming, namely, gene expression programming (GEP), is utilized to predict the flow number of dense asphalt-aggregate mixtures. The proposed constitutive models relate the flow number of Marshall specimens to the coarse and fine aggregate contents, percentage of air voids, percentage of voids in mineral aggregate, Marshall stability, and Marshall flow. Different correlations were developed using different combinations of the influencing parameters. The comprehensive experimental database used for the development of the correlations was established on the basis of a series of uniaxial dynamic-creep tests conducted in this study. Relative importance values of various predictor variables were calculated to determine their contributions to the flow number prediction. A multiple-least-squares-regression (MLSR) analysis was performed to benchmark the GEP models. For more verification, a subsequent parametric study was carried out, and the trends of the results were confirmed with the results of previous studies. The results indicate that the proposed correlations are effectively capable of evaluating the flow number of asphalt mixtures. The GEP-based formulas are simple, straightforward, and particularly valuable for providing an analysis tool accessible to practicing engineers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00123-1 · Cited by 3,735
Cited by
Roy, K., Chakraborty, P., Mitra, I., Ojha, P. K., Kar, S., & Das, R. N. (2013) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23231 · Cited by 466
Metaheuristic Algorithms in Modeling and Optimization
Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X.-S., Talatahari, S., & Alavi, A. H. (2013) · Metaheuristic Applications in Structures and Infrastructures · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398364-0.00001-2 · Cited by 268
Self-citationLiu, Q.-F., Iqbal, M. F., Yang, J., Lu, X.-Y., Zhang, P., & Rauf, M. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121082 · Cited by 259
An evolutionary approach for modeling of shear strength of RC deep beams
Gandomi, A. H., Yun, G. J., & Alavi, A. H. (2013) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-013-0039-z · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Mirzahosseini, M. R., & Nejad, F. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 248-263
- ISSN
- 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5533
- OpenAlex
- W2096185550
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154
- The paper
- Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Mirzahosseini, M. R., & Nejad, F. M. (2011). Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.