Acid, Alkali, and Chloride Resistance of Concrete Composed of Low-Carbonated Fly Ash
Abstract
This research investigates the effect of carbonated fly ash inclusion in concrete as partial replacement of cement on the durability performance when exposed to salt, sulfate, and acid solution. The effect of chemical exposure periods (30, 60, 90, and 120 days) on compressive strength and weight of concrete with low volume (25%) replacement of cement was investigated for various water curing ages (28, 56, 90, and 180 days). A comparative assessment with low volume (25% cement replacement) fly ash concrete and control concrete was also conducted. It was observed from the results that low volume carbonated fly ash concrete demonstrated a significant increase in resistance to loss in compressive strength and weight against salt, sulfate, and acid attack. Gray relation-based analysis was performed to determine suitable parameters for simultaneous minimization of strength loss and weight loss under chemical exposure. It can be recommended that, due to its cost-effectiveness, easy processing, and environmental friendly nature, carbonated fly ash can be adopted in construction as a partial replacement of cement in concrete.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concrete with carbonated fly ash as supplementary cementitious materials demonstrated strong resistance against salt, sulfate, and acid attack.
“Sahoo et al. observed that concrete with carbonated fly ash as supplementary cementitious materials demonstrated strong resistance against salt, sulfate, and acid attack [181].”
From An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry (2022) · cites this paper as [181]
Cites
Optimization of mineral carbonation process for CO2 sequestration by lime-rich coal ashes
Mayoral, M. C., Andrés, J. M., & Gimeno, M. P. (2013) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.042 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry
Li, L., & Wu, M. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102000 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sahoo, S., Das, B. B., & Mustakim, S.
- Affiliations
- KIIT University (IN)
- National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN)
- Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Das, B. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5533
- OpenAlex
- W2536160425
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Corrosion and Durability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Keywords
- fly ash concrete, partial cement replacement, acid resistance, alkali resistance, chloride resistance, sulfate attack, salt attack, compressive strength loss, weight loss, chemical exposure, grey relational analysis, concrete durability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review