Cited by 57Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Acid, Alkali, and Chloride Resistance of Concrete Composed of Low-Carbonated Fly Ash

Sahoo, S., Das, B. B., Mustakim, S.·2017·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of carbonated fly ash inclusion in concrete as partial replacement of cement on the durability performance when exposed to salt, sulfate, and acid solution. The effect of chemical exposure periods (30, 60, 90, and 120 days) on compressive strength and weight of concrete with low volume (25%) replacement of cement was investigated for various water curing ages (28, 56, 90, and 180 days). A comparative assessment with low volume (25% cement replacement) fly ash concrete and control concrete was also conducted. It was observed from the results that low volume carbonated fly ash concrete demonstrated a significant increase in resistance to loss in compressive strength and weight against salt, sulfate, and acid attack. Gray relation-based analysis was performed to determine suitable parameters for simultaneous minimization of strength loss and weight loss under chemical exposure. It can be recommended that, due to its cost-effectiveness, easy processing, and environmental friendly nature, carbonated fly ash can be adopted in construction as a partial replacement of cement in concrete.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001759

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concrete with carbonated fly ash as supplementary cementitious materials demonstrated strong resistance against salt, sulfate, and acid attack.

    “Sahoo et al. observed that concrete with carbonated fly ash as supplementary cementitious materials demonstrated strong resistance against salt, sulfate, and acid attack [181].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahoo, S., Das, B. B., & Mustakim, S.
Affiliations
  • KIIT University (IN)
  • National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN)
  • Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Das, B. B.
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2017-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
OpenAlex
W2536160425
Cited by
57
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Keywords
fly ash concrete, partial cement replacement, acid resistance, alkali resistance, chloride resistance, sulfate attack, salt attack, compressive strength loss, weight loss, chemical exposure, grey relational analysis, concrete durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review