Cited by 102Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Strength Development of Soil–Fly Ash Geopolymer: Assessment of Soil, Fly Ash, Alkali Activators, and Water

Leong, Hsiao Yun, Ong, Dominic Ek Leong, Sanjayan, Jay G., Nazari, Ali·2018·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Abstract

In this study, fly ash was added to residual soil to produce soil–fly ash geopolymer bricks. This study investigated the effects of fly ash/soil, alkali activator/ash, Na2SiO3/KOH (or NaOH), additional water content, curing condition, and curing temperature on the compressive strength of soil–fly ash geopolymer. The results showed that the optimum compressive strength was obtained when the ratios of alkali activator/ash, Na2SiO3/KOH (or NaOH) and additional water were 0.6, 0.5, and 10% respectively. A higher amount of alkali activators was required for strength development in soil–ly ash geopolymer than conventional fly ash-based geopolymers. The formation of the rigid structure at low ratios of alkali activator/ash and Na2SiO3/KOH (or NaOH) was unlikely. Compressive strength decreased when additional water was increased. High curing temperature and long curing duration showed a negative effect on strength development. The compressive strength of the soil–fly ash geopolymer varied as different mixing sequences of raw materials were used, indicating the importance of the formation of geopolymer gel in the structure. Compressive strength results obtained in this study demonstrate that soil–fly ash geopolymer can be a potential alternative to traditional clay-fired brick.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002363

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leong, H. Y., Ong, D. E. L., Sanjayan, J. G., & Nazari, A.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus (MY)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Ong, Dominic Ek Leong
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2018-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
OpenAlex
W2805180709
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
fly ash, residual soil, alkaline activator, compressive strength, curing temperature, curing time, mixing sequence, geopolymer gel, brick

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review