Wind-Induced Vibration Mitigation in Tall Buildings Using the Tuned Mass-Damper-Inerter
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, the classical linear tuned mass damper (TMD) is coupled with an inerter, a two-terminal device resisting the relative acceleration of its terminals, in various tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) topologies to suppress excessive wind-induced oscillations in tall buildings causing occupant discomfort. A parametric numerical study is undertaken involving a top-floor-TMD-equipped planar frame accurately capturing the in-plane dynamic behavior of a 74-story benchmark building exposed to a quasi-stationary spatially correlated wind-force field accounting for vortex shedding effects in the across-wind direction. It is found that the TMDI reduces peak top-floor acceleration more effectively than the TMD by considering smaller attached-mass values, and TMDI topologies in which the inerter spans more stories in linking the attached mass to the host structure. Moreover, the inclusion of the inerter dramatically reduces the TMD stroke, and it has been verified that the magnitude of the developing inerter forces can be readily accommodated by the host structure. Pertinent illustrative examples are included showcasing that the TMDI meets code-prescribed serviceability design requirements for new tall buildings using significantly smaller attached mass compared with the TMD, and that inerter devices can be used to upgrade the performance of existing TMD-equipped tall buildings without changing the attached mass.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The behaviour of TMDI performance dropping with higher mass ratio when inerter ratio is greater than 0 is unlike fixed-base structures.
“This behaviour is unlike fixed base structures as available in literature 22,42 .”
From Vibration control of spar-type floating offshore wind turbine towers using a tuned mass-damper-inerter (2020) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers
Rana, R., & Soong, T. T. (1998) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00078-3 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD
De Angelis, M., Perno, S., & Reggio, A. (2012) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.1117 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers
Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Xu, K., Bi, K., Han, Q., Li, X., & Du, X. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.067 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Sarkar, S., & Fitzgerald, B. (2020) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2471 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
An inerter-enhanced nonlinear energy sink
Javidialesaadi, A., & Wierschem, N. E. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.047 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Dai, J., Xu, Z.-D., & Gai, P.-P. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109585 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Kang, X., Huang, Q., Wu, Z., Tang, J., Jiang, X., & Lei, S. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2023.043936 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Calayir, M., Tao, J., Mercan, O., & Bezabeh, M. A. (2026) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.70129 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giaralis, A., & Petrini, F.
- Affiliations
- City, University of London (GB)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Giaralis, Agathoklis
- Venue
- Journal of Structural Engineering
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0733-9445 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-541X
- OpenAlex
- W2608110724
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-11-28)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Structural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Bristol
- City, University of London
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M017621/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
- Keywords
- wind-induced vibration, high-rise buildings, tuned mass damper, inerter, tuned mass damper inerter, vibration suppression, vortex shedding, attached mass, serviceability design, occupant comfort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review