Cited by 330Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall BuildingsStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

Wind-Induced Vibration Mitigation in Tall Buildings Using the Tuned Mass-Damper-Inerter

Open access
Giaralis, Agathoklis, Petrini, Francesco·2017·Journal of Structural Engineering

Abstract

In this paper, the classical linear tuned mass damper (TMD) is coupled with an inerter, a two-terminal device resisting the relative acceleration of its terminals, in various tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) topologies to suppress excessive wind-induced oscillations in tall buildings causing occupant discomfort. A parametric numerical study is undertaken involving a top-floor-TMD-equipped planar frame accurately capturing the in-plane dynamic behavior of a 74-story benchmark building exposed to a quasi-stationary spatially correlated wind-force field accounting for vortex shedding effects in the across-wind direction. It is found that the TMDI reduces peak top-floor acceleration more effectively than the TMD by considering smaller attached-mass values, and TMDI topologies in which the inerter spans more stories in linking the attached mass to the host structure. Moreover, the inclusion of the inerter dramatically reduces the TMD stroke, and it has been verified that the magnitude of the developing inerter forces can be readily accommodated by the host structure. Pertinent illustrative examples are included showcasing that the TMDI meets code-prescribed serviceability design requirements for new tall buildings using significantly smaller attached mass compared with the TMD, and that inerter devices can be used to upgrade the performance of existing TMD-equipped tall buildings without changing the attached mass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001863

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giaralis, A., & Petrini, F.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Giaralis, Agathoklis
Venue
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2017-09
Volume
143
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0733-9445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-541X
OpenAlex
W2608110724
Cited by
330
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4
FWCI
25.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Bristol
  • City, University of London
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M017621/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
wind-induced vibration, high-rise buildings, tuned mass damper, inerter, tuned mass damper inerter, vibration suppression, vortex shedding, attached mass, serviceability design, occupant comfort

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review