The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vehicle Ownership Modeling Framework for the State of Maryland: Analysis and Trends from 2001 and 2009 NHTS Data
Abstract
This paper presents a vehicle ownership modeling framework for the state of Maryland estimated on data extracted from the 2001 and 2009 National Household Travel Survey. The framework consists of vehicle ownership models and vehicle usage models; the models are based on a wide variety of sociodemographics, land-use variables, and operating cost. The models’ results and the deriving sensitivity analyses show that changes in income and unemployment rate or compact development have little effect on vehicle ownership rates. Nevertheless, the combined effect of high density and increase in fuel cost produce a significant reduction in vehicle usage. The vehicle ownership model estimated on 2001 data has been successfully incorporated into the Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If it is modeled, vehicle ownership often is related mainly to sociodemographic variables, not so much to built environmental variables (Cao et al., 2007; Cirillo and Liu, 2013; Kitamura et al., 2001; Pinjari et al., 2011).”
From Key Enhancements to the WFRC/MAG Four-Step Travel Demand Model (2019) · cites this paper as Cirillo and Liu, 2013
Citations
Cites
A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions
Bhat, C. R., & Pulugurta, V. (1998) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(97)00014-3 · Cited by 262
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- AdviesdienstVerkeer en Vervoer (AVV), 2000, Variabilisatie van autokosten and aanbodzijde van de mobiliteitsmarkt, eindrapport
- Baber C. (2004). “Baltimore region model application auto availability estimation using 2001 national household travel survey.” Proc. National Household Travel Survey Conf. Transportation Research Board Washington DC.
- 10.1016/0191-2615(85)90039-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.009 · DOI
- Brand D. (2009). “Impacts of higher fuel cost.” Proc. Innovation for Tomorrow’s Transportation Workshop Federal Highway Administration Washington DC.
- 10.1068/a37437 · DOI · Paper page
- Chin A., 1997, Automobile ownership and government policy: The economics of Singapore’s vehicle quota scheme, Transp. Res. A, 31, 129
- Dargay J. M., 1999, Estimation of a dynamic vehicle ownership model: A pseudo-panel approach, J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 33, 287
- 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00030-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trb.2008.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:2(179) · DOI
- 10.1016/0191-2607(90)90035-5 · DOI
- Hague Consulting Group and TØI, 1990, A model system to predict fuel use and emissions from private travel in Norway from 1985 to 2025
- Hanly M., 2000, Vehicle ownership in Great Britain—A panel data analysis
- Hensher D. A. Barnard P. O. Smith N. C. and Milthorpe F. W. (1992). Dimensions of automobile demand: A longitudinal study of automobile ownership and use North-Holland Amsterdam Netherlands. · DOI
- Kitamura R., 1992, Transportation and traffic theory
- 10.2307/2555411 · DOI
- Mohammadian A. Miller E. (2003). “Dynamic modeling of household automobile transactions.” Transportation Research Record 1831 Transportation Research Board Washington DC 98–105. · DOI
- Nobile A., 1996, A random effects multinomial probit model of vehicle ownership choice
- 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000066 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.006 · DOI
- Rashidi T. Mohammadian A. and Koppelman F. (2010). “Modeling interdependencies between vehicle transaction residential relocation and job change.” Proc. 89th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board Washington DC. · DOI
- Romilly P., 1998, Modelling and forecasting vehicle ownership in Britain: A cointegration and general to specific approach, J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 32, 165
- Russo F. and Chilà G. (2007). “Sequential models for mobility decisions: Experimentation for vehicle ownership choices.” Proc. European Transport Conf. European Transport London U.K.
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(331) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:1(24) · DOI
- Train K., 1986, Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics and an application to automobile demand
- 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00471.x · DOI
- Whelan G., 2007, Modeling vehicle ownership in Great Britain, Transp. Res. A, 41, 205
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Key Enhancements to the WFRC/MAG Four-Step Travel Demand Model
University of Utah, Ewing, R., Sabouri, S., University of Utah, Park, K., University of Utah, Lyons, T., University of Utah, Tian, G., & University of Utah (2019) · doi:10.15760/trec.246 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Cirillo, C., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yangwen
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Planning and Development
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0733-9488 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5444
- OpenAlex
- W2154570520
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Planning and Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- car ownership, vehicle usage, travel demand modeling, National Household Travel Survey, sociodemographic factors, land use, operating costs, fuel costs, urban density, compact development, Maryland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
