Microwave sintering of lunar regolith simulant for manufacturing building elements
Abstract
Development of in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) method to construct space habitats and infrastructure on the lunar surface is required for supporting sustainable space exploration. In this respect, the lunar regolith can be an appropriate construction material, and the solidification process is essential for the manufacture of construction materials using lunar regolith. Meanwhile, the microwave process is regarded as an appropriate construction technology considering construction time and area, and energy efficiency on the lunar surface with environmental constraints. In this study, sintering of lunar regolith simulant (KLS-1) was performed by microwave radiation at a frequency of 2.45 GHz. The microstructural analysis of the sintered lunar regolith simulant has been investigated in detail using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, mechanical properties of the sintered lunar regolith were also evaluated by measuring compressive strength. The results of microstructural analysis and mechanical strength evaluation indicate that the microwave sintering method can be an appropriate ISRU method for manufacturing construction materials on the lunar surface.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microwave heating is a promising method for thermal post-treatment to alter the microstructure and mechanical properties of pre-sintered materials.
“This characteristic makes microwave heating a promising method for thermal post-treatment to alter the microstructure and mechanical properties of pre-sintered materials [170,171].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [170]
Cites
Solar 3D printing of lunar regolith
Meurisse, A., Makaya, A., Willsch, C., & Sperl, M. (2018) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.063 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Chen, T., Chow, B. J., Zhong, Y., Wang, M., Kou, R., & Qiao, Y. (2018) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.050 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-J., Ryu, B.-H., Woo Jin, H., Lee, J., & Shin, H.-S.
- Affiliations
- Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KR)
- Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology
- Venue
- Earth and Space 2021
- Publisher
- American Society of Civil Engineers
- Published
- 2021-04-15
- Pages
- 985-991
- OpenAlex
- W3163582650
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Keywords
- microwave sintering, lunar regolith simulant, in-situ resource utilization, lunar construction materials, space habitats, compressive strength, microstructure, 2.45 GHz microwave radiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review