Cited by 4Fish Ecology and Management StudiesHydraulic flow and structuresFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulent Surface Velocities and Fish Movement in an Open Channel Flow with Implications for Agent-Based Models

Qiao, Jundong, Bennett, Sean J., Atkinson, Joseph F.·2023·Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Abstract

Fish passage design could greatly benefit from knowledge of the movement and path choices of fish in complex, turbulent environments, but empirical information required to construct and validate agent-based models is generally not available. To address this issue, an image-based data analysis scheme is proposed to measure turbulent flow and fish motion simultaneously using a small keystone species to exemplify the procedures. Using the same video images collected in a laboratory channel, large-scale particle tracking velocimetry is employed to compute the instantaneous Eulerian flow field, and a fish detection model and background-foreground subtraction method are used to identify fish positions. The fish detection model uses deep learning with an architecture based on a faster regional convolutional neural network (faster R-CNN). This methodology and architecture are shown to have a success rate greater than 93% in identifying fish positions. Data are then presented to illustrate the utility of this technique as it relates to agent-based models for fish movement. These results show that when velocities surrounding a swimming fish are spatially averaged, the values derived from time-averaged velocities are markedly different when compared to those derived from instantaneous velocities, as evidenced by relatively large root-mean-square errors. A swimming fatigue analysis also shows that, in general, the fish would swim for relatively short durations when experiencing fatigue i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/jhend8.hyeng-13496

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This versatility makes ABMs crucial for policy analysis, scenario testing, and decision-making across diverse fields such as urban development, ecological systems, tourism, and healthcare.

    “This versatility makes ABMs crucial for policy analysis, scenario testing, and decision-making across diverse fields such as urban development (Li et al., 2020), ecological systems (Qiao et al., 2023), tourism (Farhan et al., 2023), and healthcare (Abdulkareem et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Qiao, J., Bennett, S. J., & Atkinson, J. F.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Published
2023-09
Volume
149
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0733-9429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7900
OpenAlex
W4383221506
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Hydraulic flow and structures
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Keywords
fish movement, turbulent flow, open channel flow, fish passage design, agent-based modeling, particle tracking velocimetry, fish detection, Faster R-CNN, swimming fatigue, keystone species, river restoration, image-based measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review