The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mass spectrometric characterization of a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer
Abstract
Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has become an important method for the detection of many compounds because of its high sensitivity and amenability to miniaturization for field-portable monitoring; applications include detection of narcotics, explosives, and chemical warfare agents. High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) differs from IMS in that the electric fields are applied using a high-frequency periodic asymmetric waveform, rather than a dc voltage. Furthermore, in FAIMS the compounds are separated by the difference in the mobility of ions at high electric field relative to low field, rather than by compound to compound differences in mobility at low electric field (IMS). We report here the first cylindrical-geometry-FAIMS interface with mass spectrometry (FAIMS-MS) and the MS identification of the peaks observed in a FAIMS compensation voltage (CV) spectrum. Using both an electrometer-based-FAIMS (FAIMS-E) and FAIMS-MS, several variables that affect the sensitivity of ion detection were examined for two (polarity reversed) asymmetric waveforms (modes 1 and 2) each of which yields a unique spectrum. An increase in the dispersion voltage (DV) was found to improve the sensitivity and separation observed in the FAIMS CV spectrum. This increase in sensitivity and the unexpected dissimilarity in modes 1 and 2 suggest that atmospheric pressure ion focusing is occurring in the FAIMS analyzer. The sensitivity and peak locations in the CV spectra were affected by temperature, gas flow rates, operating pressure, and analyte concentration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
Gabelica, V., Shvartsburg, A. A., Afonso, C., Barran, P., Benesch, J. L. P., Bleiholder, C., Bowers, M. T., Bilbao, A., Bush, M. F., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21585 · Cited by 493
Oligosaccharide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry: A Review of Recent Developments
Kailemia, M. J., Ruhaak, L. R., Lebrilla, C. B., & Amster, I. J. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403969n · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Purves, R. W., Guevremont, R., Day, S., Pipich, C. W., & Matyjaszczyk, M. S.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4094-4105
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W2051185298
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass spectrometric characterization of a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1149255
- The paper
- Purves, R. W., Guevremont, R., Day, S., Pipich, C. W., & Matyjaszczyk, M. S. (1998). Mass spectrometric characterization of a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.