The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric pressure ion focusing in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer
Abstract
The focusing of ions at atmospheric pressure and room temperature in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer (FAIMS) has been investigated. FAIMS operates with the application of a high-voltage, high-frequency asymmetric waveform across parallel plates. This establishes conditions wherein an ion migrates towards one of the plates because of a difference in the ion mobility at the low and high electric field conditions during application of the waveform. The migration can be stopped by applying a dc compensation voltage (CV) which serves to create a “balanced” condition wherein the ion experiences no net transverse motion. This method has also been called “transverse field compensation ion mobility spectrometry” and “field ion spectrometry®.” If this experiment is conducted using a device with cylindrical geometry, rather than with flat plates, an ion focusing region can exist in the annular space between the two concentric cylinders. Ion trajectory modeling showed that the behavior of the ions in the cylindrical geometry FAIMS analyzer was unlike any previously described atmospheric pressure ion optics system. The ions appeared to be trapped, or focused by being caught between two opposing forces. Requirements for establishing this focus for a given ion were identified: the applied waveform must be asymmetric, the electric field must be sufficiently high that the mobility of the ion deviates from its low-field value during the high-voltage portion of the asymmetric waveform, and finally, the electric field must be nonuniform in space (e.g., cylindrical or spherical geometry). Experimental observations with a prototype FAIMS device, which was designed to measure the radial distribution of ions in the FAIMS analyzer region, have confirmed the results of ion trajectory modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Fundamental Concepts, Instrumentation, Applications, and the Road Ahead
Dodds, J. N., & Baker, E. S. (2019) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-019-02288-2 · Cited by 574
Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
Gabelica, V., Shvartsburg, A. A., Afonso, C., Barran, P., Benesch, J. L. P., Bleiholder, C., Bowers, M. T., Bilbao, A., Bush, M. F., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21585 · Cited by 493
Ion mobility mass spectrometry of proteins and proteinassemblies
Uetrecht, C., Rose, R. J., van Duijn, E., Lorenzen, K., & Heck, A. J. R. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b914002f · Cited by 462
High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry: A new tool for mass spectrometry
Guevremont, R. (2004) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.119 · Cited by 444
Self-citationLapthorn, C., Pullen, F., & Chowdhry, B. Z. (2013) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21349 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Guevremont, R., & Purves, R. W.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1370-1383
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W1975022146
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric pressure ion focusing in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1149599
- The paper
- Guevremont, R., & Purves, R. W. (1999). Atmospheric pressure ion focusing in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometer. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.