The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiphoton detection using visible light photon counter
Abstract
Visible light photon counters feature noise-free avalanche multiplication and narrow pulse height distribution for single photon detection events. Such a well-defined pulse height distribution for a single photon detection event, combined with the fact that the avalanche multiplication is confined to a small area of the whole detector, opens up the possibility for the simultaneous detection of two photons. In this letter, we investigated this capability using twin photons generated by parametric down conversion, and present a high quantum efficiency (∼47%) detection of two photons with good time resolution (∼2 ns), which can be distinguished from a single-photon incidence with a small bit-error rate (∼0.63%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The KLM recipe consists of two parts: an optical circuit for a CNOT gate using linear optics, single photon sources, and photon number resolving detectors; and a scheme for increasing the success probability of this CNOT gate arbitrarily close to unity.
“The KLM 'recipe' consists of two parts: an optical circuit for a CNOT gate using linear optics, single photon sources [11], and photon number resolving detectors [12]; and a scheme [13] for increasing the success probability of this CNOT gate ( P = 1 / 16) arbitrarily close to unity, which harnesses quantum teleportation [14] with linear optics [15].”
From Realization of a Knill-Laflamme-Milburn controlled-NOT photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 1993, Appl. Opt., 32, 3894, 10.1364/AO.32.003894 · DOI
- 1987, Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 406, 10.1063/1.98404 · DOI
- 1992, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 314, 56, 10.1016/0168-9002(92)90498-S · DOI
- 1996, Nature (London), 381, 135, 10.1038/381135a0 · DOI
- 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 52, 3380, 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3380 · DOI
- 1998, Nature (London), 394, 840, 10.1038/29674 · DOI
- 1998, Nature (London), 394, 841, 10.1038/29678 · DOI
- 1996, Proc. IEEE, 84, 1719, 10.1109/5.546399 · DOI
- 1982, Opt. Lett., 7, 529, 10.1364/OL.7.000529 · DOI
- 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 48, R867, 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.R867 · DOI
- 1994, Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, 1177, 10.1063/1.110881 · DOI
- 1966, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-13, 164, 10.1109/T-ED.1966.15651 · DOI
- 1997, Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, 2852, 10.1063/1.119022 · DOI
- 1998, Meeting Abstracts of the Phys. Soc. of Japan, 53, 292
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination
Miller, A. J., Nam, S. W., Martinis, J. M., & Sergienko, A. V. (2003) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1596723 · Cited by 285
Waveguide-integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
Ferrari, S., Schuck, C., & Pernice, W. (2017) · Nanophotonics · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2018-0059 · Cited by 167
Quantum Entanglement of a Large Number of Photons
Eisenberg, H. S., Khoury, G., Durkin, G. A., Simon, C., & Bouwmeester, D. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.193901 · Cited by 137
Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., & Takeuchi, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018839108 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Takeuchi, S., Yamamoto, Y., & Hogue, H. H.
- Affiliations
- ERATO Quantum Fluctuation Project, E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
- Research and Technology Center, Boeing North American, Anaheim, California 92803
- Venue
- Applied Physics Letters
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-02-15
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 902-904
- ISSN
- 0003-6951
- 1077-3118
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
