Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative ab initio study of the structures, energetics and spectra of X−⋅(H2O)n=1–4 [X=F, Cl, Br, I] clusters

Kim, Jongseob, Lee, Han Myoung, Suh, Seung Bum, Majumdar, D., Kim, Kwang S.·2000·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

X − ⋅(H 2 O) n=1–4 [X=F, Cl, Br, I] have been studied using high level ab initio calculations. This extensive work compares the structures of the different halide water clusters and has found that the predicted minimum energy geometries for different cluster are accompanied by several other structures close to these global minima. Hence the most highly populated structures can change depending on temperature due to the entropy effect. As the potential surfaces are flat, the wide-ranging zero point vibrational effects are important at 0 K, and not only a number of low-lying energy conformers but also large amplitude motions can be important in determining structures, energies, and spectra at finite temperatures. The binding energies, ionization potentials, charge-transfer-to-solvent (CTTS) energies, and the O–H stretching frequencies are reported, and compared with the experimental data available. A distinctive difference between F−⋅(H2O)n and X−⋅(H2O)n (X=Cl, Br, I) is noted, as the former tends to favor internal structures with negligible hydrogen bonding between water molecules, while the latter favors surface structures with significant hydrogen bonding between water molecules. These characteristics are well featured in their O–H spectra of the clusters. However, the spectra are forced to be very sensitive to the temperature, which explains some differences between different spectra. In case of F−⋅(H2O)n, a significant charge transfer is noted in the S0 ground state, which results in much less significant charge transfer in the S1 excited state compared with other hydrated halide clusters which show near full charge transfers in the S1 excited states. Finally, the nature of the stabilization interactions operative in these clusters has been explained in terms of many-body interaction energies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1290016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., Lee, H. M., Suh, S. B., Majumdar, D., & Kim, K. S.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
113
Issue
13
Pages
5259-5272
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2093505807
Cited by
243
References
0
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative ab initio study of the structures, energetics and spectra of X−⋅(H2O)n=1–4 [X=F, Cl, Br, I] clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1290016
The paper
Kim, J., Lee, H. M., Suh, S. B., Majumdar, D., & Kim, K. S. (2000). Comparative ab initio study of the structures, energetics and spectra of X−⋅(H2O)n=1–4 [X=F, Cl, Br, I] clusters. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1290016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.