The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance indirect spin–spin coupling constants at the generalized gradient approximation and hybrid levels of density-functional theory
Abstract
A fully analytical implementation of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) indirect nuclear spin–spin coupling constants at the density-functional theory (DFT) level is presented. The implementation involves all four contributions of the nonrelativistic Ramsey theory: The dia- and para-magnetic spin–orbit contributions as well as the paramagnetic Fermi-contact and spin–dipole contributions. Three different exchange-correlation functionals—LDA (local density approximation), BLYP (Becke–Lee–Yang–Parr), and B3LYP (hybrid BLYP)—are tested by comparison with experiment and high-level ab initio calculations for a series of molecules containing first-row elements. All three levels of theory represent a significant improvement on restrictred Hartree–Fock (RHF) theory in the sense that the RHF instability problems are absent in DFT. Also, there is a steady improvement in the quality of the calculated spin–spin couplings in the sequence LDA, BLYP, and B3LYP. For the first-row molecules investigated by us, the hybrid B3LYP functional performs particularly well, with errors similar to those observed at the best ab initio levels of theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory
Koch, W., & Holthausen, M. C. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600043 · Cited by 4,880
Recent developments in the P y SCF program package
Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Banerjee, S., Bao, P., Barbry, M., Blunt, N. S., Bogdanov, N. A., Booth, G. H., Chen, J., Cui, Z.-H., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0006074 · Cited by 1,259
Metadata
- Authors
- Helgaker, T., Watson, M., & Handy, N. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 9402-9409
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2087252627
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance indirect spin–spin coupling constants at the generalized gradient approximation and hybrid levels of density-functional theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1321296
- The paper
- Helgaker, T., Watson, M., & Handy, N. C. (2000). Analytical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance indirect spin–spin coupling constants at the generalized gradient approximation and hybrid levels of density-functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1321296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.