The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulations
Open accessAbstract
A general approach has been developed to allow accurate simulations of a small region part of a large macromolecular system while incorporating the influence of the remaining distant atoms with an effective boundary potential. The method is called the Generalized Solvent Boundary Potential (GSBP). By representing the surrounding solvent as a continuum dielectric, both the solvent-shielded static field from the distant atoms of the macromolecule and the reaction field from the dielectric solvent acting on the atoms in the region of interest are included. The static field is calculated once, using the finite-difference Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) equation, and the result is stored on a discrete grid for efficient simulations. The solvent reaction field is developed using a basis-set expansion whose coefficients correspond to generalized electrostatic multipoles. A matrix representing the reaction field Green’s function between those generalized multipoles is calculated only once using the PB equation and stored for efficient simulations. In the present work, the formalism is applied to both spherical and orthorhombic simulation regions for which orthonormal basis-sets exist based on spherical harmonics or cartesian Legendre polynomials. The GSBP method is also tested and illustrated with simple model systems and two detailed atomic systems: the active site region of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (spherical region) and the interior of the KcsA potassium channel (orthorhombic region). Comparison with numerical finite-difference PB calculations shows that GSBP can accurately describe all long-range electrostatic interactions and remain computationally inexpensive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G., & Im, W. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20945 · Cited by 9,284
Self-citationQM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Jiang, W., & Roux, B. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct1001768 · Cited by 260
Self-citationCHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed
Hwang, W., Austin, S. L., Blondel, A., Boittier, E. D., Boresch, S., Buck, M., Buckner, J., Caflisch, A., Chang, H.-T., Cheng, X., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Im, W., Bernèche, S., & Roux, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2924-2937
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2614767951
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1336570
- The paper
- Im, W., Bernèche, S., & Roux, B. (2001). Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1336570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.