Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New insights into the fragility dilemma in liquids

Huang, Dinghai, McKenna, Gregory B.·2001·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A compilation of data for small molecule organic, polymeric, and inorganic glass-forming liquids shows that the original expectation, that there be a positive correlation between the thermodynamic measure of fragility Cpl/Cpg (or Cpl/Cpc) and the dynamic fragility index m, is not generally true. The results are consistent with three classes of behavior: (1) a decrease in m with increasing Cpl/Cpg for the polymeric glass formers; (2) a nearly constant value of m independent of Cpl/Cpc for small molecule organics and hydrogen bonding small molecules; (3) an increasing value of m with increasing Cpl/Cpc for inorganic glass formers as originally considered by Angell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1348029

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Huang, D., & McKenna, G. B.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
114
Issue
13
Pages
5621-5630
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1988694571
Cited by
310
References
55
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New insights into the fragility dilemma in liquids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1348029
The paper
Huang, D., & McKenna, G. B. (2001). New insights into the fragility dilemma in liquids. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1348029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.