The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of electron paramagnetic resonance g values using coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham theory
Abstract
A method for calculating the EPR g-tensor based on coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional theory (DFT) is presented. The one-electron molecular orbitals of a spin- unrestricted Slater determinant are calculated up to first order in the applied magnetic field. The g-tensor is evaluated as a mixed second derivative property with respect to the applied field and the electron magnetic moment. Thus, spin-polarization and spin–orbit coupling are simultaneously included in the calculation. The treatment focuses on orbitally nondegenerate molecules but is valid for a general ground state spin S and, for the first time, it is possible to include hybrid density functionals in the treatment. The relativistic mass and diamagnetic gauge corrections are also considered. An implementation of the theory is described. Extensive numerical calculations for a series of small molecules are reported with the Hartree–Fock (HF) method, the local density approximation (LSD), the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and hybrid density functionals such as B3LYP and PBE0 and large Gaussian basis sets. Detailed comparison with available ab initio and DFT calculations are made. The results indicate that the hybrid functionals offer little or no improvement over the GGA functionals for small radicals made of light atoms. For transition metal complexes the situation is different. The hybrid functionals give, on average, better results than the GGA functionals but significant disagreement between theoretical and experimental g-shifts still remain. Overall, the results indicate that the present method is among the most accurate so far developed models for the prediction of g values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
Recent developments in the P y SCF program package
Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Banerjee, S., Bao, P., Barbry, M., Blunt, N. S., Bogdanov, N. A., Booth, G. H., Chen, J., Cui, Z.-H., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0006074 · Cited by 1,259
Neese, F. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1540619 · Cited by 384
Self-citationImprota, R., & Barone, V. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960085f · Cited by 323
Biaso, F., Burlat, B., & Guigliarelli, B. (2012) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic201533p · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Neese, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-12-22
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11080-11096
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2013226985
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of electron paramagnetic resonance g values using coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1419058
- The paper
- Neese, F. (2001). Prediction of electron paramagnetic resonance g values using coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1419058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.