The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretation of the Kohn–Sham orbital energies as approximate vertical ionization potentials
Open accessAbstract
Theoretical analysis and results of calculations are put forward to interpret the energies −εk of the occupied Kohn–Sham (KS) orbitals as approximate but rather accurate relaxed vertical ionization potentials (VIPs) Ik. Exact relations between εk and Ik are established with a set of linear equations for the εk, which are expressed through Ik and the matrix elements εkresp of a component of the KS exchange-correlation (xc) potential vxc, the response potential vresp. Although −Ik will be a leading contribution to εk, other Ij≠k do enter through coupling terms which are determined by the overlaps between the densities of the KS orbitals as well as by overlaps between the KS and Dyson orbital densities. The orbital energies obtained with “exact” KS potentials are compared with the experimental VIPs of the molecules N2, CO, HF, and H2O. Very good agreement between the accurate −εk of the outer valence KS orbitals and the corresponding VIPs is established. The average difference, approaching 0.1 eV, is about an order of magnitude smaller than for HF orbital energies. The lower valence KS levels are a few eV higher than the corresponding −Ik, and the core levels some 20 eV, in agreement with the theoretically deduced upshift of the KS levels compared to −Ik by the response potential matrix elements. Calculations of 64 molecules are performed with the approximate vxc obtained with the statistical averaging of (model) orbitals potentials (SAOP) and the calculated εk are compared with 406 experimental VIPs. Reasonable agreement between the SAOP −εk and the outer valence VIPs is found with an average deviation of about 0.4 eV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Cited by
Endres, J., Egger, D. A., Kulbak, M., Kerner, R. A., Zhao, L., Silver, S. H., Hodes, G., Rand, B. P., Cahen, D., Kronik, L., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00946 · Cited by 451
The interpretation of XPS spectra: Insights into materials properties
Bagus, P. S., Ilton, E. S., & Nelin, C. J. (2013) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.03.001 · Cited by 448
Rinke, P., Qteish, A., Neugebauer, J., Freysoldt, C., & Scheffler, M. (2005) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/126 · Cited by 300
The GW-Method for Quantum Chemistry Applications: Theory and Implementation
van Setten, M. J., Weigend, F., & Evers, F. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300648t · Cited by 284
Adenine Tautomers: Relative Stabilities, Ionization Energies, and Mismatch with Cytosine
Fonseca Guerra, C., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Saha, S., & Wang, F. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp057275r · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Chong, D. P., Gritsenko, O. V., & Baerends, E. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1760-1772
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2012279747
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of the Kohn–Sham orbital energies as approximate vertical ionization potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1430255
- The paper
- Chong, D. P., Gritsenko, O. V., & Baerends, E. J. (2002). Interpretation of the Kohn–Sham orbital energies as approximate vertical ionization potentials. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1430255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.