Cited by 32Aerogels and thermal insulationSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

Aerogel beads as cryogenic thermal insulation system

Open access
Fesmire, J. E.·2002·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

An investigation of the use of aerogel beads as thermal insulation for cryogenic applications was conducted at the Cryogenics Test Laboratory of NASA Kennedy Space Center. Steady-state liquid nitrogen boiloff methods were used to characterize the thermal performance of aerogel beads in comparison with conventional insulation products such as perlite powder and multilayer insulation (MLI). Aerogel beads produced by Cabot Corporation have a bulk density below 100 kilograms per cubic meter (kg/m3) and a mean particle diameter of 1 millimeter (mm). The apparent thermal conductivity values of the bulk material have been determined under steady-state conditions at boundary temperatures of approximately 293 and 77 kelvin (K) and at various cold vacuum pressures (CVP). Vacuum levels ranged from 10−5 torr to 760 torr. All test articles were made in a cylindrical configuration with a typical insulation thickness of 25 mm. Temperature profiles through the thickness of the test specimens were also measured. The results showed the performance of the aerogel beads was significantly better than the conventional materials in both soft-vacuum (1 to 10 torr) and no-vacuum (760 torr) ranges. Opacified aerogel beads performed better than perlite powder under high-vacuum conditions. Further studies for material optimization and system application are in progress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1472188

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scholtens et al. and Fesmire et al. reported conductivity data at various vacuum levels but only at an average temperature of 185 K and lack temperature variation.

    “Similarly, Scholtens et al. [77] and Fesmire et al. [32] have reported the conductivity data at various vacuum levels but only at an average temperature of 185 K and lack the temperature variation.”
  • For perlite insulation under high vacuum (P < 0.1 Pa), the solid and radiation contributions to thermal conductivity are fitted by correlations given in the paper.

    “The fitted correlations of solid and radiation contributions to perlite insulation are given by:”

    From Effective thermal conductivity of insulation materials for cryogenic LH2 storage tanks: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results and Discussion section reports measured apparent thermal conductivity for perlite and says radiation begins to dominate below 100 millitorr. The only equation located calculates the total insulation system’s apparent conductivity; searches for fitted solid and radiation correlations for perlite found none in our copy. No page numbers were available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fesmire, J.E., Augustynowicz, S.D., "Insulation Testing Using Cryostat Apparatus With Sleeve," Ad- vances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 45, K[uwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2000, pp. 1683-1690.
  2. Adams, L.,"Thermal Conductivity ofEvacuated Perlite," inCryogenic Technology Journal of the Cryo- genic Society of America, Vol. 1, No. 6, 1965, pp. 249-251.
  3. Kaganer, M.G., "Thermal Insulation in Cryogenic Engineering," in Israel Program for Scientific Trans- lations, Inc., IPST Press, Jerusalem, 1969, pp. 114-116.
  4. Fesmire, J.E., Rouanet, S., and Ryu, J., "Aerogel-Based Cryogenic Superinsulation," in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 44, Plenum Press, New York, 1998, pp. 219-226.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fesmire, J. E.
Affiliations
Kennedy Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fesmire, J. E.
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
AIP
Published
2002
Volume
613
Pages
1541-1548
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1609476054
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Keywords
cryogenic insulation, thermal conductivity, multilayer insulation, temperature profiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review