Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critical note on density functional theory studies on rare-gas dimers

van Mourik, Tanja, Gdanitz, Robert J.·2002·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

In recent literature, some authors claim to have successfully applied density functional theory (DFT) methods to the attractive interaction between rare-gas atoms. In this note, we make a critical survey of these works and come to the conclusion that, in contrast to the claims made, state-of-the-art DFT methods are incapable of accounting for dispersion effects in a quantitative way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1476010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
van Mourik, T., & Gdanitz, R. J.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2002-06-08
Volume
116
Issue
22
Pages
9620-9623
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2044682512
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical note on density functional theory studies on rare-gas dimers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1476010
The paper
van Mourik, T., & Gdanitz, R. J. (2002). A critical note on density functional theory studies on rare-gas dimers. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1476010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.