The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiconfigurational nuclear-electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations
Abstract
The nuclear-electronic orbital (NEO) method for the calculation of mixed nuclear-electronic wave functions is presented. Both electronic and nuclear molecular orbitals are expressed as linear combinations of Gaussian basis functions. In the NEO-HF (Hartree-Fock) method, the energy corresponding to the single-configurational mixed nuclear-electronic wave function is minimized with respect to the molecular orbitals. Multiconfigurational approaches are implemented to include significant correlation effects. In the NEO-CI (configuration interaction) method, the energy corresponding to the multiconfigurational mixed nuclear-electronic wave function is minimized with respect to the CI coefficients. In the NEO-MCSCF (multiconfigurational self-consistent-field) method, the energy is minimized with respect to the molecular orbitals as well as the CI coefficients. Analytic gradient expressions are presented for NEO-HF and NEO-MCSCF. These analytic gradients allow the variational optimization of the centers of the nuclear basis functions. They also enable the location and characterization of geometry stationary points and the generation of minimum energy paths and dynamic reaction paths. The advantages of the NEO approach are that nuclear quantum effects are incorporated during the electronic structure calculation, the Born-Oppenheimer separation of electrons and nuclei is avoided, excited vibrational-electronic states may be calculated, and its accuracy may be improved systematically. Initial applications are presented to illustrate the computational feasibility and accuracy of this approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632
Cited by
Theory of Coupled Electron and Proton Transfer Reactions
Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Stuchebrukhov, A. A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001436 · Cited by 848
Self-citationBrunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Baiardi, A., & Reiher, M. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5129672 · Cited by 306
Bubin, S., Pavanello, M., Tung, W.-C., Sharkey, K. L., & Adamowicz, L. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200419d · Cited by 175
Nakai, H. (2007) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.21379 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, S. P., Iordanov, T., & Hammes-Schiffer, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4106-4118
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1995410992
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiconfigurational nuclear-electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1494980
- The paper
- Webb, S. P., Iordanov, T., & Hammes-Schiffer, S. (2002). Multiconfigurational nuclear-electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1494980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.