The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The generalized Douglas–Kroll transformation
Abstract
We derive the most general parametrization of the unitary matrices in the Douglas–Kroll (DK) transformation sequence for relativistic electronic structure calculations. It is applied for a detailed analysis of the generalized DK transformation up to fifth order in the external potential. While DKH2–DKH4 are independent of the parametrization of the unitary matrices, DKH5 turns out to be dependent on the third expansion coefficient of the innermost unitary transformation which is carried out after the initial free-particle Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation. The freedom in the choice of this expansion coefficient vanishes consistently if the optimum unitary transformation is sought for. Since the standard protocol of the DK method is the application of unitary transformations to the one-electron Dirac operator, we analyze the DKH procedure up to fifth order for hydrogenlike atoms. We find remarkable accuracy of the higher-order DK corrections as compared to the exact Dirac ground state energy. In the case of many-electron atomic systems, we investigate the order of magnitude of the higher-order corrections in the light of the neglect of the DK transformation of the two-electron terms of the many-particle Hamiltonian. A careful analysis of the silver and gold atoms demonstrates that both the fourth- and fifth-order one-electron DK transformation yield a smaller contribution to the total electronic energy than the DK transformation of the two-electron terms. In order to improve significantly on the third-order correction DKH3, it is thus mandatory to include the DK transformation of the two-electron terms as well as the spin-dependent terms before proceeding to higher orders in the transformation of the one-electron terms. However, an analysis of the ionization energies of these atoms indicates that already DKH3 yields a highly accurate treatment of the scalar-relativistic effects on properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Neese, F., Petrenko, T., Ganyushin, D., & Olbrich, G. (2007) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.019 · Cited by 332
The Douglas–Kroll–Hess Approach
Nakajima, T., & Hirao, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200040s · Cited by 283
Hard-X-Ray-Induced Multistep Ultrafast Dissociation
Travnikova, O., Marchenko, T., Goldsztejn, G., Jänkälä, K., Sisourat, N., Carniato, S., Guillemin, R., Journel, L., Céolin, D., Püttner, R., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.213001 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, A., Reiher, M., & Hess, B. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-11-22
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9215-9226
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1979617332
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The generalized Douglas–Kroll transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1515314
- The paper
- Wolf, A., Reiher, M., & Hess, B. A. (2002). The generalized Douglas–Kroll transformation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1515314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.