The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method
Abstract
Two new techniques for modeling chemical processes in condensed phases with combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potentials are introduced and tested on small, model compounds. The first technique, the double link atom (DLA) method, is an extension of the traditional, single link atom (SLA) method to avoid some of the problems with the latter method. These problems are primarily electrostatic, as the SLA method can produce an unphysical overall charge or dipole. The second technique, the delocalized Gaussian MM charge (DGMM) method, is an empirical way to include the delocalized character of the electron density of atoms in the MM region. This can be important for the electrostatic interaction of the QM region with nearby atoms in the MM region, and it can simplify the rules governing which classical interactions are included in the energies and forces. Even for very short distances, the DGMM method does not require the neglect of the MM host in the QM calculation. The DGMM method can be used for modeling reactions in solution, and it can be combined with methods such as the link atom, frozen orbital, or pseudopotential methods for terminating the QM region at a covalent bond. The DLA and the DGMM methods have been combined effectively. Presented here are tests on small, model systems that mimic properties important for reactions in proteins, in particular rotational barriers, proton affinities, and deprotonation energies. The new methods yield improved energetics for model compounds, vis-à-vis a point-MM-charge and SLA treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
Friesner, R. A., & Guallar, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094410 · Cited by 522
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Classical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed
Hwang, W., Austin, S. L., Blondel, A., Boittier, E. D., Boresch, S., Buck, M., Buckner, J., Caflisch, A., Chang, H.-T., Cheng, X., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, D., Eurenius, K. P., Billings, E. M., Sherwood, P., Chatfield, D. C., Hodošček, M., & Brooks, B. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-12-15
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 10534-10547
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2021268632
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1520134
- The paper
- Das, D., Eurenius, K. P., Billings, E. M., Sherwood, P., Chatfield, D. C., Hodošček, M., & Brooks, B. R. (2002). Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1520134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.