Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method

Das, Debananda, Eurenius, Kirsten P., Billings, Eric M., Sherwood, Paul, Chatfield, David C., Hodošček, Milan, Brooks, Bernard R.·2002·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Two new techniques for modeling chemical processes in condensed phases with combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potentials are introduced and tested on small, model compounds. The first technique, the double link atom (DLA) method, is an extension of the traditional, single link atom (SLA) method to avoid some of the problems with the latter method. These problems are primarily electrostatic, as the SLA method can produce an unphysical overall charge or dipole. The second technique, the delocalized Gaussian MM charge (DGMM) method, is an empirical way to include the delocalized character of the electron density of atoms in the MM region. This can be important for the electrostatic interaction of the QM region with nearby atoms in the MM region, and it can simplify the rules governing which classical interactions are included in the energies and forces. Even for very short distances, the DGMM method does not require the neglect of the MM host in the QM calculation. The DGMM method can be used for modeling reactions in solution, and it can be combined with methods such as the link atom, frozen orbital, or pseudopotential methods for terminating the QM region at a covalent bond. The DLA and the DGMM methods have been combined effectively. Presented here are tests on small, model systems that mimic properties important for reactions in proteins, in particular rotational barriers, proton affinities, and deprotonation energies. The new methods yield improved energetics for model compounds, vis-à-vis a point-MM-charge and SLA treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1520134

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Das, D., Eurenius, K. P., Billings, E. M., Sherwood, P., Chatfield, D. C., Hodošček, M., & Brooks, B. R.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2002-12-15
Volume
117
Issue
23
Pages
10534-10547
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2021268632
Cited by
185
References
1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1520134
The paper
Das, D., Eurenius, K. P., Billings, E. M., Sherwood, P., Chatfield, D. C., Hodošček, M., & Brooks, B. R. (2002). Optimization of quantum mechanical molecular mechanical partitioning schemes: Gaussian delocalization of molecular mechanical charges and the double link atom method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1520134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.