The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews
Open accessAbstract
Physicists seek simplicity in universal laws. Ecologists revel in complex interdependencies. A sustainable future for our planet will probably require a look at life from both sides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.122 · Cited by 5,016
Cited by
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387
Hydroclimatic shifts driven by human water use for food and energy production
Destouni, G., Jaramillo, F., & Prieto, C. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1719 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Harte, J.
- Venue
- Physics Today
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 29-34
- ISSN
- 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0699
- OpenAlex
- W2058942088
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 93.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1522164
- The paper
- Harte, J. (2002). Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews. Physics Today. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1522164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
