The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Domain epitaxy: A unified paradigm for thin film growth
Abstract
We present a unified model for thin film epitaxy where single crystal films with small and large lattice misfits are grown by domain matching epitaxy (DME). The DME involves matching of lattice planes between the film and the substrate having similar crystal symmetry. In this framework, the conventional lattice matching epitaxy becomes a special case where a matching of lattice constants or the same planes is involved with a small misfit of less than 7%–8%. In large lattice mismatch systems, we show that epitaxial growth of thin films is possible by matching of domains where integral multiples of major lattice planes match across the interface. We illustrate this concept with atomic-level details in the TiN/Si(100) with 3/4 matching, the AlN/Si(100)with 4/5 matching, and the ZnO/α−Al2O3(0001) with 6/7 matching of major planes across the film/substrate interface. By varying the domain size, which is equal to intregral multiple of lattice planes, in a periodic fashion, it is possible to accommodate additional misfit beyond perfect domain matching. Thus, we can potentially design epitaxial growth of films with any lattice misfit on a given substrate with atomically clean surfaces. In situ x-ray diffraction studies on initial stages of growth of ZnO films on sapphire correctly identify a compressive stress and a rapid relaxation within 1 to 2 monolayers, consistent with the DME framework and the fact that the critical thickness is less than 1 monolayer. DME examples ranging from the Ge–Si/Si(100) system with 49/50 matching (2% strain) to metal/Si systems with 1/2 matching (50% strain) are tabulated, strategies for growing strain-free films by engineering the misfit to be confined near the interface are presented, and the potential for epitaxial growth of films with any lattice misfit on a given substrate with atomically clean surfaces is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, X., Zeng, Z., Bao, S., Wang, M., Qi, X., Fan, Z., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2472 · Cited by 849
A practical guide to pulsed laser deposition
Shepelin, N. A., Tehrani, Z. P., Ohannessian, N., Schneider, C. W., Pergolesi, D., & Lippert, T. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00938b · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayan, J., & Larson, B. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 278-285
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2019643648
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain epitaxy: A unified paradigm for thin film growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1528301
- The paper
- Narayan, J., & Larson, B. C. (2003). Domain epitaxy: A unified paradigm for thin film growth. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1528301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.