The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable reaction coordinate transition state theory: Analytic results and application to the C2H3+H→C2H4 reaction
Abstract
A novel derivation is provided for the canonical, microcanonical, and energy E and total angular momentum J resolved reactive flux within the variable reaction coordinate transition state theory (VRC-TST) formalism. The use of an alternative representation for the reaction coordinate velocity yields a new expression for the kinematic factor which better illustrates its dependence on the pivot point location, and which can be straightforwardly evaluated. Also, the use of a geometric approach in place of an earlier algebraic one clarifies the derivation as does the use of Lagrange multiplier methodology for the analytic integration over the total angular momentum. Finally, a quaternion representation for the fragment and line-of-centers orientations is employed in place of the Euler angle or internal/external rotational coordinates used in prior studies. The result is an efficient, and particularly easy to implement, methodology for performing variable reaction coordinate transition state theory calculations. Furthermore, the simplicity of the derivation allows for the straightforward generalization to alternative forms for the dividing surface, as is illustrated by deriving the expressions for the cases of elliptical and planar dividing surfaces. Application to the C2H3+H reaction yields results for the total rate coefficient that are generally only 15% greater than those obtained from related trajectory simulations, thereby demonstrating the accuracy of the VRC-TST formalism. Meanwhile, results for the two separate addition channels (frontside and backside) illustrate the difficulty of accurately apportioning the total flux and particularly the inadequacy of canonical predictions for the channel specific optimized dividing surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Current Status of Transition-State Theory
Truhlar, D. G., Garrett, B. C., & Klippenstein, S. J. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953748q · Cited by 2,279
Self-citation
Cited by
MESMER: An Open-Source Master Equation Solver for Multi-Energy Well Reactions
Glowacki, D. R., Liang, C.-H., Morley, C., Pilling, M. J., & Robertson, S. H. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp3051033 · Cited by 629
Predictive theory for the combination kinetics of two alkyl radicals
Klippenstein, S. J., Georgievskii, Y., & Harding, L. B. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b515914h · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Georgievskii, Y., & Klippenstein, S. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-03-07
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5442-5455
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2049173638
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable reaction coordinate transition state theory: Analytic results and application to the C2H3+H→C2H4 reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1539035
- The paper
- Georgievskii, Y., & Klippenstein, S. J. (2003). Variable reaction coordinate transition state theory: Analytic results and application to the C2H3+H→C2H4 reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1539035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.