Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative prediction of gas-phase C13 nuclear magnetic shielding constants

Auer, Alexander A., Gauss, Jürgen, Stanton, John F.·2003·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Benchmark calculations of C13 nuclear magnetic shielding constants are performed for a set of 16 molecules. It is demonstrated that near-quantitative accuracy (∼1–2 ppm deviation from experiment) can be achieved if (1) electron correlation is adequately treated by employing the coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) model augmented by perturbative corrections for triple excitations [CCSD(T)], (2) large (uncontracted) basis sets are used, (3) calculations are performed at accurate equilibrium geometries (obtained from CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ or CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ calculations), and (4) vibrational averaging is included. In this way [CCSD(T)/13s9p4d3f calculations corrected for vibrational effects], the mean deviation and standard deviation from experiment are 1.6 and 0.8 ppm, respectively. Less complete theoretical treatments result in larger errors. Consideration of relative shifts might reduce the mean deviation (through an appropriately chosen reference compound), but cannot change the standard deviation. Density-functional theory calculations of nuclear magnetic shielding constants are found to be less accurate, intermediate between Hartree–Fock self-consistent-field and second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1574314

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Auer, A. A., Gauss, J., & Stanton, J. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2003-06-15
Volume
118
Issue
23
Pages
10407-10417
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W4245912665
Cited by
253
References
50
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative prediction of gas-phase C13 nuclear magnetic shielding constants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1574314
The paper
Auer, A. A., Gauss, J., & Stanton, J. F. (2003). Quantitative prediction of gas-phase C13 nuclear magnetic shielding constants. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1574314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.