The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrostatic interactions in dissipative particle dynamics—simulation of polyelectrolytes and anionic surfactants
Abstract
Electrostatic interactions have been incorporated in dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation. The electrostatic field is solved locally on a grid. Within this formalism, local inhomogeneities in the electrostatic permittivity can be treated without any problem. Key issues like the screening of the potential near a charged surface and the Stillinger–Lovett moment conditions are satisfied. This implies that the method captures the essential features of electrostatic interaction. For the direct simulation of mixed surfactants near oil–water interfaces, or for the simulation of Coulombic polymer–surfactant interactions, this method has all the advantages of DPD over full atomistic molecular dynamics (MD). DPD has proven to be faster than MD by many orders of magnitude, depending on the precise scaling factor chosen for the simulation. This brings phenomena of microseconds in reach of routine simulation, while maintaining a fairly accurate representation of the structure of the molecules. As an example of this simulation tool, the interaction between a cationic polyelectrolyte and anionic surfactant is discussed. Without a surfactant, the polyelectrolyte shows a fractal dimensionality that is in line with the theoretical and experimental values cited in literature, it behaves as a fairly stiff rod, df∼1.1. When salt is replaced by anionic surfactant, the polymer wraps around one or more discrete surfactant micelles, in line with the current understanding of these systems, and scaling invariance in the correlation function is broken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Lyubartsev, A. P., & Laaksonen, A. (1995) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.52.3730 · Cited by 852
Cited by
Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
Jiao, K., & Li, X. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.002 · Cited by 1,086
Coarse grain models and the computer simulation of soft materials
Nielsen, S. O., Lopez, C. F., Srinivas, G., & Klein, M. L. (2004) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/15/r03 · Cited by 423
Classical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
Towards extreme scale dissipative particle dynamics simulations using multiple GPGPUs
Castagna, J., Guo, X., Seaton, M., & O’Cais, A. (2020) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107159 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Groot, R. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-06-22
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11265-11277
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2110447282
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrostatic interactions in dissipative particle dynamics—simulation of polyelectrolytes and anionic surfactants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1574800
- The paper
- Groot, R. D. (2003). Electrostatic interactions in dissipative particle dynamics—simulation of polyelectrolytes and anionic surfactants. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1574800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.