The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction procedure
Abstract
A multireference configuration interaction (MR-CI) based method (Spectroscopy ORiented CI, SORCI) is proposed to calculate energy differences between several electronic states of possibly different multiplicity and which can be extended to fairly large molecules. It combines several well-known concepts in order to achieve efficiency, balance, generality, stability and accuracy: (a) the use of any kind of (preferably small) reference space and any kind of initial self-consistent field treatment, (b) the use of average approximate natural orbitals (AANOs) for the states of interest, (c) a variational treatment of the strongly interacting many electron states combined with second order multireference Møller–Plesset perturbation theory for the much larger weakly interacting remainder, (d) the concept of difference-dedicated CI developed and extensively used by Malrieu and co-workers that avoids contributions which are expected to cancel in energy differences, (e) the use of the resolution-of-the identity approximation to avoid exceedingly large integral files. The method is completely devoid of intruder state problems and makes extensive use of truncation techniques in order to achieve computational efficiency. Currently three cutoffs are introduced that control the size of the reference space, the size of the variational treatment and the size of the AANO basis. Test calculations show that the method is stable against variations of these parameters over a wide range. A study of prototypical molecules ranging in size between diatomics and free-base porphin indicates that the method yields accurate results even with moderate basis sets and CI dimensions that typically do not exceed ∼105 configuration state functions. Transition energies are typically predicted within 0.1–0.3 eV from the experimental values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neese, F. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja061798a · Cited by 494
Self-citationBrunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Progress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States
González, L., Escudero, D., & Serrano‐Andrés, L. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100200 · Cited by 429
Neese, F., Petrenko, T., Ganyushin, D., & Olbrich, G. (2007) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.019 · Cited by 332
Self-citationBannwarth, C., & Grimme, S. (2014) · Computational and Theoretical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2014.02.023 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Neese, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-11-08
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9428-9443
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2039862840
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1615956
- The paper
- Neese, F. (2003). A spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction procedure. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1615956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.