The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods
Abstract
The efficiencies of two recently developed methods for calculating free energy changes along a generalized coordinate in a system are discussed in the context of other, related approaches. One method is based on Jarzynski’s identity [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997)]. The second method relies on thermodynamic integration of the average force and is called the adaptive biasing force method [Darve and Pohorille, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9169 (2001)]. Both methods are designed such that the system evolves along the chosen coordinate(s) without experiencing free energy barriers and they require calculating the instantaneous, unconstrained force acting on this coordinate using the formula derived by Darve and Pohorille. Efficiencies are analyzed by comparing analytical estimates of statistical errors and by considering two numerical examples—internal rotation of hydrated 1,2-dichloroethane and transfer of fluoromethane across a water-hexane interface. The efficiencies of both methods are approximately equal in the first but not in the second case. During transfer of fluoromethane the system is easily driven away from equilibrium and, therefore, the performance of the method based on Jarzynski’s identity is poor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laio, A., & Gervasio, F. L. (2008) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601 · Cited by 1,619
Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations
Darve, E., Rodríguez-Gómez, D., & Pohorille, A. (2008) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2829861 · Cited by 871
Self-citationAssessing the Accuracy of Metadynamics
Laio, A., Rodriguez-Fortea, A., Gervasio, F. L., Ceccarelli, M., & Parrinello, M. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045424k · Cited by 517
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Efficient Determination of Protein–Protein Standard Binding Free Energies from First Principles
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400273t · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Darve, E., & Pohorille, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-02-22
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3563-3578
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1988486335
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1642607
- The paper
- Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Darve, E., & Pohorille, A. (2004). Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1642607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.