Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size dependent ion hydration, its asymmetry, and convergence to macroscopic behavior

Rajamani, Sowmianarayanan, Ghosh, Tuhin, Garde, Shekhar·2004·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The packing and orientation of water molecules in the vicinity of solutes strongly influence the solute hydration thermodynamics in aqueous solutions. Here we study the charge density dependent hydration of a broad range of spherical monovalent ionic solutes (with solute diameters from ∼0.4 nm to 1.7 nm) through molecular dynamics simulations in the simple point charge model of water. Consistent with previous experimental and theoretical studies, we observe a distinct asymmetry in the structure and thermodynamics of hydration of ions. In particular, the free energy of hydration of negative ions is more favorable than that of positive ions of the same size. This asymmetry persists over the entire range of solute sizes and cannot be captured by a continuum description of the solvent. The favorable hydration of negative ions arises primarily from the asymmetric charge distribution in the water molecule itself, and is reflected in (i) a small positive electrostatic potential at the center of a neutral solute, and (ii) clear structural (packing and orientation) differences in the hydration shell of positive and negative ions. While the asymmetry arising from the positive potential can be quantified in a straightforward manner, that arising from the structural differences in the fully charged states is difficult to quantify. The structural differences are highest for the small ions and diminish with increasing ion size, converging to hydrophobiclike hydration structure for the largest ions studied here. We discuss semiempirical measures following Latimer, Pitzer, and Slansky [J. Chem. Phys. 7, 108 (1939)] that account for these structural differences through a shift in the ion radius. We find that these two contributions account completely for the asymmetry of hydration of positive and negative ions over the entire range of ion sizes studied here. We also present preliminary calculations of the dependence of ion hydration asymmetry on the choice of water model that demonstrate its sensitivity to the details of ion–water interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1644536

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Rajamani, S., Ghosh, T., & Garde, S.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
120
Issue
9
Pages
4457-4466
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2089159346
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size dependent ion hydration, its asymmetry, and convergence to macroscopic behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1644536
The paper
Rajamani, S., Ghosh, T., & Garde, S. (2004). Size dependent ion hydration, its asymmetry, and convergence to macroscopic behavior. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1644536

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.