The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging science and technology of antimatter plasmas and trap-based beams
Abstract
Progress in the ability to accumulate and cool positrons and antiprotons is enabling new scientific and technological opportunities. The driver for this work is plasma physics research—developing new ways to create and manipulate antimatter plasmas. An overview is presented of recent results and near-term goals and challenges. In atomic physics, new experiments on the resonant capture of positrons by molecules provide the first direct evidence that positrons bind to “ordinary” matter (i.e., atoms and molecules). The formation of low-energy antihydrogen was observed recently by injecting low-energy antiprotons into a cold positron plasma. This opens up a range of new scientific opportunities, including precision tests of fundamental symmetries such as invariance under charge conjugation, parity, and time reversal, and study of the chemistry of matter and antimatter. The first laboratory study of electron-positron plasmas has been conducted by passing an electron beam through a positron plasma. The next major step in these studies will be the simultaneous confinement of electron and positron plasmas. Although very challenging, such experiments would permit studies of the nonlinear behavior predicted for this unique and interesting plasma system. The use of trap-based positron beams to study transport in fusion plasmas and to characterize materials is reviewed. More challenging experiments are described, such as the creation of a Bose-condensed gas of positronium atoms. Finally, the future of positron trapping and beam formation is discussed, including the development of a novel multicell trap to increase by orders of magnitude the number of positrons trapped, portable antimatter traps, and cold antimatter beams (e.g., with energy spreads ⩽1 meV) for precision studies of positron-matter interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geonium theory: Physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap
Brown, L. S., & Gabrielse, G. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.233 · Cited by 1,367
Background-Free Observation of Cold Antihydrogen with Field-Ionization Analysis of Its States
Gabrielse, G., Bowden, N. S., Oxley, P., Speck, A., Storry, C. H., Tan, J. N., Wessels, M., Grzonka, D., Oelert, W., Schepers, G., et al. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.213401 · Cited by 562
Open-endcap Penning traps for high precision experiments
Gabrielse, G., Haarsma, L., & Rolston, S. L. (1989) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes · doi:10.1016/0168-1176(89)85027-x · Cited by 288
Cited by
Relativistic Positron Creation Using Ultraintense Short Pulse Lasers
Chen, H., Wilks, S. C., Bonlie, J. D., Liang, E. P., Myatt, J., Price, D. F., Meyerhofer, D. D., & Beiersdorfer, P. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.105001 · Cited by 356
The production of molecular positronium
Cassidy, D. B., & Mills, A. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06094 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Surko, C. M., & Greaves, R. G.
- Venue
- Physics of Plasmas
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2333-2348
- ISSN
- 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7674
- OpenAlex
- W1982096601
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging science and technology of antimatter plasmas and trap-based beams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1651487
- The paper
- Surko, C. M., & Greaves, R. G. (2004). Emerging science and technology of antimatter plasmas and trap-based beams. Physics of Plasmas. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1651487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.