The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perturbed Hartree–Fock Theory. I. Diagrammatic Double-Perturbation Analysis
Abstract
The coupled Hartree–Fock scheme, for calculating atomic and molecular properties which are second order in some perturbing field, is studied with the help of a double-perturbation expansion and diagrammatic techniques. The double-perturbation expansion, with the external field as one perturbation (H(1)) and the difference between the true electron-repulsion potential and the Hartree–Fock potential as the other (V), is compared with an iterative solution of the set of coupled Hartree–Fock equations for the first-order perturbed orbitals. The term in the double-perturbation expansion that is second order in H(1) and zeroth order in V is shown to be the Dalgarno “uncoupled” second-order energy. The coupled Hartree–Fock second-order (in H(1)) energy expression includes all terms first order in V and some of the terms to all orders in V, up to infinite order. It is shown how to separate the diagrams contributing to the CPHF energy from those that do not; in particular, the CPHF equations are composed of the so-called “bubble diagrams” and their corresponding exchange diagrams. It is shown that each particle–hole pair, or “bubble,” is independent of all the other particle–hole pairs, in the sense that the total energy contribution from the diagram can be factored into contributions from the individual particle–hole pairs. It is shown that the first-order perturbed wave-function obtained from the coupled Hartree–Fock formalism includes effects due to all singly-excited determinants and a certain class of linear combinations of doubly-excited determinants, namely those singlet spin eigenfunctions which correspond to two electrons being excited without spin flips from Hartree–Fock unexcited orbitals to virtual orbitals; there exists a second, linearly independent, doubly excited singlet function which is not included in the CPHF wavefunction and does not contribute to the perturbation energy. The contribution to the second-order energy from the doubly excited determinants amounts to about 10% of the total CPHF second-order energy in the case of some electric and magnetic properties of H2 and 25% of the total second-order energy corresponding to the electric dipole polarizability of the Be atom. The larger contribution of the terms involving doubly excited determinants for Be has its origin in the fact that a double excitation from the 2s to the 2p orbital gives a large fraction of the correlation energy between the 2s electrons and that the single excitation from the 2s to the 2p orbital is the largest single contribution to the polarizability. An alternate iterative scheme for the solution of the coupled Hartree–Fock equations is derived. This alternate iterative scheme, which includes certain terms summed to infinite order, is expected to be a considerable improvement over the simple scheme which starts with the “uncoupled” approximation as the zeroth iteration. Comparisons of the different schemes for the properties considered in this paper are made to confirm this conclusion. The CPHF energy (second order in H(1)) is partitioned approximately into a part due to correcting the unperturbed Hartree–Fock wavefunction for correlation and a part due to correcting the uncoupled Hartree–Fock perturbed wavefunction for correlation; the contribution from the former was shown to be about 10%–20% of that from the latter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A linear response, coupled-cluster theory for excitation energy
Sekino, H., & Bartlett, R. J. (1984) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.560260826 · Cited by 710
Champagne, B., Perpète, E. A., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Baerends, E.-J., Snijders, J. G., Soubra-Ghaoui, C., Robins, K. A., & Kirtman, B. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.477731 · Cited by 482
Derivative studies in hartree-fock and møller-plesset theories
Pople, J. A., Krishnan, R., Schlegel, H. B., & Binkley, J. S. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.560160825 · Cited by 317
Multireference Electron Correlation Methods: Journeys along Potential Energy Surfaces
Park, J. W., Al-Saadon, R., MacLeod, M. K., Shiozaki, T., & Vlaisavljevich, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Caves, T. C., & Karplus, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1969-05-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3649-3661
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1973078616
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perturbed Hartree–Fock Theory. I. Diagrammatic Double-Perturbation Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1671609
- The paper
- Caves, T. C., & Karplus, M. (1969). Perturbed Hartree–Fock Theory. I. Diagrammatic Double-Perturbation Analysis. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1671609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.