Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 891

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cluster Formation in Expanding Supersonic Jets: Effect of Pressure, Temperature, Nozzle Size, and Test Gas

Hagena, O. F., Obert, W.·1972·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

To study homogeneous condensation in an expanding nozzle flow, cluster beams were sampled from the core of the flow field and transferred into a vacuum chamber for further analysis. Sonic and hypersonic nozzles with throat diameters 0.015 cm ≤ d ≤ 0.15 cm were used. Source temperature was varied between 120 ≤ T0 ≤ 450° K, source pressure between 100 ≤ p0 ≤ 12 000 torr. Test gases were the rare gases (except He), N2, and CO2. The size of the clusters (=microdroplets or -crystals) and the intensity of the cluster beam was measured with a through-flow ionization detector with retarding potential system to get the mass-to-charge distribution of the cluster ions. The mean cluster size N̄ varied between 102 and 104 atoms/cluster. The mean cluster size remained almost constant with increasing T0 if p0 was increased simultaneously according to the isentropic relation p0T0γ /(1−γ)=const. Considering the various types of cluster-growth reactions one expects to get cluster beams with the same size, if p0 and T0 fall within the narrow range between the isentrope p0T0γ /(1−γ)=const and the line for equal bimolecular processes, p0T0(1.5γ −1)/(1−γ)=const. The experiments confirm this result. The same model predicts that a decrease of nozzle throat diameter d can be compensated by an increase of source pressure p0 such that p0dq=const with 0<q<1. The experimental scaling law for constant cluster size gives q=0.8 for argon and q=0.6 for CO2. Comparing different gases, the same cluster size N̄ was obtained for the rare gases if they were in corresponding states prior to expansion and if the reduced nozzle scale was the same. This confirms the model of ``corresponding jets'' which extends the thermodynamic principle of corresponding states to real gas effects in a time-dependent system like a nozzle flow, and which applies equally to condensation in slow and fast expansions, including the transition to molecular flow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1677455

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 891

Metadata

Authors
Hagena, O. F., & Obert, W.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1972-03-01
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
1793-1802
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2016557184
Cited by
891
References
0
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster Formation in Expanding Supersonic Jets: Effect of Pressure, Temperature, Nozzle Size, and Test Gas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1677455
The paper
Hagena, O. F., & Obert, W. (1972). Cluster Formation in Expanding Supersonic Jets: Effect of Pressure, Temperature, Nozzle Size, and Test Gas. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1677455

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.