The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules
Abstract
Two extended basis sets (termed 5–31G and 6–31G) consisting of atomic orbitals expressed as fixed linear combinations of Gaussian functions are presented for the first row atoms carbon to fluorine. These basis functions are similar to the 4–31G set [J. Chem. Phys. 54, 724 (1971)] in that each valence shell is split into inner and outer parts described by three and one Gaussian function, respectively. Inner shells are represented by a single basis function taken as a sum of five (5–31G) or six (6–31G) Gaussians. Studies with a number of polyatomic molecules indicate a substantial lowering of calculated total energies over the 4–31G set. Calculated relative energies and equilibrium geometries do not appear to be altered significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 1966, J. Chem. Phys., 45, 2593, 10.1063/1.1727979 · DOI
- 1967, J. Computational Phys., 2, 223
- 1967, J. Chem. Phys., 46, 4725, 10.1063/1.1840626 · DOI
- 1967, J. Chem. Phys., 46, 2759, 10.1063/1.1841110 · DOI
- 1968, J. Chem. Phys., 49, 2056, 10.1063/1.1670367 · DOI
- 1967, J. Chem. Phys., 47, 201
- 1968, J. Chem. Phys., 49, 5007, 10.1063/1.1669992 · DOI
- 1969, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 2189, 10.1021/ja01037a001 · DOI
- 1967, J. Chem. Phys., 47, 564, 10.1063/1.1711932 · DOI
- 1966, J. Chem. Phys., 44, 359, 10.1063/1.1726470 · DOI
- 1969, J. Chem. Phys., 51, 256, 10.1063/1.1671716 · DOI
- 1971, J. Chem. Phys., 54, 724, 10.1063/1.1674902 · DOI · Paper page
- 1970, J. Chem. Phys., 52, 5001, 10.1063/1.1672736 · DOI
- 1954, J. Chem. Phys., 22, 571, 10.1063/1.1740120 · DOI
- 1967, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 4253, 10.1021/ja00993a001 · DOI · Paper page
- 1970, Chem. Phys. Letters, 5, 13, 10.1016/0009-2614(70)80116-6 · DOI
- 1970, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 4796, 10.1021/ja00719a006 · DOI · Paper page
- 1971, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 289, 10.1021/ja00731a001 · DOI
Cited by
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Self-citationAlecu, I. M., Zheng, J., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100326h · Cited by 1,667
The aromatic fluctuation index (FLU): A new aromaticity index based on electron delocalization
Matito, E., Duran, M., & Solà, M. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1824895 · Cited by 516
Barkoutsos, P. K., Gonthier, J. F., Sokolov, I., Moll, N., Salis, G., Fuhrer, A., Ganzhorn, M., Egger, D. J., Troyer, M., Mezzacapo, A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022322 · Cited by 363
New perspectives in multireference perturbation theory: the n-electron valence state approach
Angeli, C., Pastore, M., & Cimiraglia, R. (2007) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-006-0207-0 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R., & Pople, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1972-03-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2257-2261
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2046412723
- Cited by
- 15,855
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1677527
- The paper
- Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R., & Pople, J. A. (1972). Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1677527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
