The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Iterative perturbation calculations of ground and excited state energies from multiconfigurational zeroth-order wavefunctions
Abstract
A method is proposed to calculate the effect of configuration interaction by a Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation expansion when starting from a multiconfigurational wavefunction. It is shown that a careless choice of H0 may lead to absurd transition energies between two states, at the first orders of the perturbation, even when the perturbation converges for both states. A barycentric defintion of H0 is proposed, which ensures the cancellation of common diagrams in the calculated transition energies. A practical iterative procedure is defined which allows a progressive improvement of the unperturbed wavefunction ψ0; the CI matrix restricted to a subspace S of strongly interacting determinants is diagonalized. The desired eigenvector ψ0 of this matrix is perturbed by the determinants which do not belong to S. The most important determinants in ψ1 are added to S, etc. The energy thus obtained after the second-order correction is compared with the ordinary perturbation series where ψ0 is a single determinant. For the ground state, this procedure includes, besides the whole second-order correction, the most important terms of the third and fourth orders. The question of orthogonality of excited states is discussed. This technique, hereafter called CIPSI, has been tested on the ground and several excited states of H2, Ne, and MgO, showing both a rapid convergence of the calculated transition energy and the importance of correlation effects on transition energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
The Configuration Interaction Method: Advances in Highly Correlated Approaches
David Sherrill, C., & Schaefer, H. F. (1999) · Advances in Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3276(08)60532-8 · Cited by 447
Convergence of an improved CIPSI algorithm
Evangelisti, S., Daudey, J.-P., & Malrieu, J.-P. (1983) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/0301-0104(83)85011-3 · Cited by 438
Self-citationNeese, F., Petrenko, T., Ganyushin, D., & Olbrich, G. (2007) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.019 · Cited by 332
Baiardi, A., & Reiher, M. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5129672 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Huron, B., Malrieu, J. P., & Rancurel, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1973-06-15
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5745-5759
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2033134911
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative perturbation calculations of ground and excited state energies from multiconfigurational zeroth-order wavefunctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1679199
- The paper
- Huron, B., Malrieu, J. P., & Rancurel, P. (1973). Iterative perturbation calculations of ground and excited state energies from multiconfigurational zeroth-order wavefunctions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1679199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.