The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. II Applications
Abstract
The Fourier amplitude method developed in Paper I as a diagnostic tool for determining the sensitivity of the results of complex calculations to the parameters which enter these calculations has been applied to two chemical reaction systems involving sets of coupled, nonlinear rate equations. These were: (a) a five reaction set describing the high temperature (6000 °K) dissociation of air and (b) a nine reaction set describing the constant temperature (2000 °K) combustion of H2 and O2. We have evaluated the Fourier amplitudes for all the species at a number of different times for both reaction systems. The analysis of these results verifies the claims made in Paper I. The relative magnitudes of the Fourier amplitudes showed a several order of magnitude distribution which permitted a clear distinction of the relative sensitivity of the species concentration to uncertainties in the rate coefficients. The conclusions based on the Fourier amplitude method for these two reaction systems are in excellent agreement with sensitivity predictions which could be made on the basis of previous kinetic studies of these systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology
Marino, S., Hogue, I. B., Ray, C. J., & Kirschner, D. E. (2008) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.011 · Cited by 2,999
A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & Chan, K. P.-S. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594 · Cited by 2,275
Sensitivity analysis methods in the biomedical sciences
Qian, G., & Mahdi, A. (2020) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108306 · Cited by 169
Kontoravdi, C., Asprey, S. P., Pistikopoulos, E. N., & Mantalaris, A. (2008) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp050028k · Cited by 85
Sexton, J., Everingham, Y. L., & Inman-Bamber, G. (2017) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.009 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaibly, J. H., & Shuler, K. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1973-10-15
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3879-3888
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2068068744
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. II Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1680572
- The paper
- Schaibly, J. H., & Shuler, K. E. (1973). Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. II Applications. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1680572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.