Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides

Van de Walle, Chris G., Neugebauer, Jörg·2004·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

First-principles calculations have evolved from mere aids in explaining and supporting experiments to powerful tools for predicting new materials and their properties. In the first part of this review we describe the state-of-the-art computational methodology for calculating the structure and energetics of point defects and impurities in semiconductors. We will pay particular attention to computational aspects which are unique to defects or impurities, such as how to deal with charge states and how to describe and interpret transition levels. In the second part of the review we will illustrate these capabilities with examples for defects and impurities in nitride semiconductors. Point defects have traditionally been considered to play a major role in wide-band-gap semiconductors, and first-principles calculations have been particularly helpful in elucidating the issues. Specifically, calculations have shown that the unintentional n-type conductivity that has often been observed in as-grown GaN cannot be attributed to nitrogen vacancies, but is due to unintentional incorporation of donor impurities. Native point defects may play a role in compensation and in phenomena such as the yellow luminescence, which can be attributed to gallium vacancies. In the section on impurities, specific attention will be focused on dopants. Oxygen, which is commonly present as a contaminant, is a shallow donor in GaN but becomes a deep level in AlGaN due to a DX transition. Magnesium is almost universally used as the p-type dopant, but hole concentrations are still limited. Reasons for this behavior are discussed, and alternative acceptors are examined. Hydrogen plays an important role in p-type GaN, and the mechanisms that underlie its behavior are explained. Incorporating hydrogen along with acceptors is an example of codoping; a critical discussion of codoping is presented. Most of the information available to date for defects and impurities in nitrides has been generated for GaN, but we will also discuss AlN and InN where appropriate. We conclude by summarizing the main points and looking towards the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1682673

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 3,257

Metadata

Authors
Van de Walle, C. G., & Neugebauer, J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
95
Issue
8
Pages
3851-3879
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2015773728
Cited by
3,257
References
2
FWCI
34.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1682673
The paper
Van de Walle, C. G., & Neugebauer, J. (2004). First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1682673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.