The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew
Abstract
A re-parameterization of the standard TIP4P water model for use with Ewald techniques is introduced, providing an overall global improvement in water properties relative to several popular nonpolarizable and polarizable water potentials. Using high precision simulations, and careful application of standard analytical corrections, we show that the new TIP4P-Ew potential has a density maximum at ∼1 °C, and reproduces experimental bulk-densities and the enthalpy of vaporization, ΔHvap, from −37.5 to 127 °C at 1 atm with an absolute average error of less than 1%. Structural properties are in very good agreement with x-ray scattering intensities at temperatures between 0 and 77 °C and dynamical properties such as self-diffusion coefficient are in excellent agreement with experiment. The parameterization approach used can be easily generalized to rehabilitate any water force field using available experimental data over a range of thermodynamic points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationWater Is the Key to Nonclassical Nucleation of Amorphous Calcium Carbonate
Raiteri, P., & Gale, J. D. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja108508k · Cited by 420
Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton
Shaw, D. E., Dror, R. O., Salmon, J. K., Grossman, J. P., Mackenzie, K. M., Bank, J. A., Young, C., Deneroff, M. M., Batson, B., Bowers, K. J., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis · doi:10.1145/1654059.1654099 · Cited by 382
The Properties of Water: Insights from Quantum Simulations
Paesani, F., & Voth, G. A. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp810590c · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, H. W., Swope, W. C., Pitera, J. W., Madura, J. D., Dick, T. J., Hura, G. L., & Head-Gordon, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-05-22
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9665-9678
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2024726841
- Cited by
- 2,121
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
