The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The importance of three-body terms in the fragment molecular orbital method
Abstract
A previously proposed two-body fragment molecular orbital method based on the restricted Hartree–Fock (RHF) method was extended to include explicit three-body terms. The accuracy of the method was tested on a set of representative molecules: (H2O)n, n=16, 32, and 64, as well as α and β n-mers of alanine, n=10, 20, and 40, using STO-3G, 3-21G, 6-31G, and 6-31++G** basis sets. Two- and three-body results are presented separately for assigning one and two molecules (or residues) per fragment. Total energies are found to differ from the regular RHF method by at most ΔE2/1=0.06, ΔE2/2=0.04, ΔE3/1=0.02, and ΔE3/2=0.003 (a.u.); rms energy gradients differ by at most ΔG2/1=0.0015, ΔG2/2=0.000 75, ΔG3/1=0.000 20, and ΔG3/2=0.000 10 (a.u./bohr), and rms dipole moments are reproduced with at most δD2/1=3.7, δD2/2=3.4, δD3/1=2.6, and δD3/2=3.1 (%) relative error, where the subscript notation n/m refers to the n-body method based on m molecules (residues) per fragment. A few of the largest three-body calculations were performed with a separated trimer approximation, which presumably somewhat lowered the accuracy of mostly dipole moments which are very sensitive to slight variations in the density distribution. The proposed method is capable of providing sufficient chemical accuracy while providing detailed information on many-body interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extending the Power of Quantum Chemistry to Large Systems with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method
Fedorov, D. G., & Kitaura, K. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0716740 · Cited by 567
Self-citationComputational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials
Marenich, A. V., Ho, J., Coote, M. L., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01572j · Cited by 508
Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis
Fedorov, D. G., & Kitaura, K. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20496 · Cited by 470
Self-citationSaitow, M., Becker, U., Riplinger, C., Valeev, E. F., & Neese, F. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4981521 · Cited by 423
Review of multicomponent molecular orbital method for direct treatment of nuclear quantum effect
Ishimoto, T., Tachikawa, M., & Nagashima, U. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.22069 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Fedorov, D. G., & Kitaura, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-04-15
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6832-6840
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2002150668
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The importance of three-body terms in the fragment molecular orbital method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1687334
- The paper
- Fedorov, D. G., & Kitaura, K. (2004). The importance of three-body terms in the fragment molecular orbital method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1687334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.