Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Laser Generation of Excitons and Fluorescence in Anthracene Crystals

Singh, S., Jones, W. J., Siebrand, W., Stoicheff, B. P., Schneider, W. G.·1965·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical studies are reported of the short-lived and delayed fluorescence of anthracene single crystals, excited by single- and double-photon absorption. A giant-pulse ruby laser provides the primary source of radiation of 14 400 cm−1 (up to 1027 photons/cm2·sec) and is also used to generate second-harmonic radiation from ADP, as well as stimulated Raman radiation of 12 800 and 17 500 cm−1 from liquid oxygen. The time dependence of the fluorescence intensity is studied as a function of laser intensity, crystal temperature and excitation wavelength. The very intense fast fluorescence with a half-life of 30 nsec at 300°K, characteristic of singlet exciton decay, and the relatively weak delayed fluorescence which involves intermediate triplet states, are separated using sectored disks. It is concluded that the triplet state at 14 750 cm−1 can be populated (i) by direct absorption of laser photons involving an activation energy of 350 cm−1; (ii) via two-photon absorption, presumably leading to a vibrationally excited state of the 1B2u exciton, followed by intersystem crossing; (iii) via one-photon (second-harmonic) excitation from levels≥700 cm−1 into the singlet absorption band, followed by conversion of the singlet exciton into a triplet pair. The latter process is suggested by the observed activation energy of 700 cm−1. In agreement with these interpretations, the delayed fluorescence intensity is found to vary with the second to fourth power of the laser intensity depending on the experimental conditions. Also, light of 17 500 cm−1 leads exclusively to Process (i), light of 12 800 cm−1 exclusively to (ii). Triplet lifetimes from 2–17 msec are obtained, depending on crystal purity, which indicates that unimolecular triplet decay is an extrinsic, radiationless process. A singlet—triplet intersystem crossing rate constant of about 3×10−5 sec−1 is estimated. The triplet—triplet annihilation rate constant is found to be about 5×10−11 cm3 sec−1. This value considered together with the triplet-pair creation process suggests a triplet exchange rate ≳ 1013 sec−1 and a triplet diffusion constant ≳o5×10−4cm2/sec.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1695695

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Singh, S., Jones, W. J., Siebrand, W., Stoicheff, B. P., & Schneider, W. G.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1965-01-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
330-342
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2094622988
Cited by
484
References
0
FWCI
16.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laser Generation of Excitons and Fluorescence in Anthracene Crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1695695
The paper
Singh, S., Jones, W. J., Siebrand, W., Stoicheff, B. P., & Schneider, W. G. (1965). Laser Generation of Excitons and Fluorescence in Anthracene Crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1695695

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.