Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generalization of a Theorem by Goldberg and Sachs

Robinson, I., Schild, A.·1963·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

A connection is established between algebraic degeneracy of the Weyl tensor, the existence of a null geodesic shear-free congruence, and certain restrictions on the Ricci tensor which are weaker than the gravitational equations for empty space. The result is roughly, with some important qualifications, that any two of these conditions imply the third. These restrictions on the metric are shown to be invariant under conformal transformations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1703980

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1962, Acta Physica Polonica, 22, 13
  2. 1961, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A264, 309
  3. 1961, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys., 9, 543
  4. 1961, J. Math. Phys., 2, 290, 10.1063/1.1703712 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, I., & Schild, A.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1963-04-01
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
484-489
ISSN
  • 0022-2488
  • 1089-7658
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.