Cited by 166Thermal properties of materialsAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesSemiconductor materials and interfaces

Thermal Conductivity of GaAs and GaAs1− x P x Laser Semiconductors

Carlson, R. O., Slack, G. A., Silverman, S. J.·1965·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

Measurements of thermal conductivity for the range 3° to 300°K are reported for both pure and heavily doped n- and p-type GaAs single crystals, and n-type heavily doped polycrystalline GaAs1−xPx crystals with six compositions between x=0 and x=0.5. The alloy ingots have much lower K values due to alloy scattering, with a composition of 35% phosphide content (near the limit of laser operation) having a K less than 1/20 that of pure GaAs at 77°K. Hence heat dissipation is a serious obstacle to continuous operation of alloy lasers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1714018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk thermal conductivity of GaAs at T = 300 K is 50 W/mK.

    “The bulk thermal conductivities of GaAs, GaN, AlN, and SiC (4H and 6H) at T = 300 K are 501213, 2301415, 28516, and 490 Wm−1K−11718, respectively.”
  • This suppression is expected when LP is shorter than the MFPs of some phonons.

    “This suppression is expected when LP is shorter than the MFPs of some phonons12.”
  • BB-FDTR and TDTR measurements have demonstrated that a constant value of thermal conductivity over the range of measured heating frequencies (0.2 ≤ f1 ≤ 200 MHz) accurately identifies the expected bulk values of SiO2 and platinum samples with little deviation between measured data and analytical fits.

    “BB-FDTR and TDTR measurements have demonstrated that a constant value of thermal conductivity over the range of measured heating frequencies (0.2 ≤ f1 ≤ 200 MHz) accurately identifies the expected bulk values of SiO2 and platinum samples with little deviation between the measured data and analytical fits12.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, R. O., Slack, G. A., & Silverman, S. J.
Affiliations
General Electric (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1965-02-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
505-507
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W1965178750
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor materials and interfaces
Keywords
thermal conductivity, GaAs, GaAsP alloys, semiconductor lasers, heat dissipation, alloy scattering, degenerate semiconductors, low-temperature thermal transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review