Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 690

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monte Carlo Study of a One-Component Plasma. I

Brush, S. G., Sahlin, H. L., Teller, E.·1966·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A Monte Carlo study has been made of a plasma of heavy ions immersed in a uniform neutralizing background. Systems containing from 32 to 500 particles, with periodic boundary conditions, were used. The results of the study are presented in terms of a dimensionless parameter Γ= (4πn/3) ⅓[(Ze)2/kT], where n is the ion density (particles per cubic centimeter), T is the temperature (degrees Kelvin), k is the Boltzmann constant, e is the electronic charge, and Z is the atomic number. Thermodynamic properties and pair distribution functions were obtained for values of Γ ranging from 0.05 to 100.0 from the canonical ensemble by the Monte Carlo (MC) method. Two different methods were used to determine the potential energy of a configuration. The first is the ``minimum-image convention'' employed in many previous MC calculations. Each particle is allowed to interact only with each other particle in the basic cell, or with the nearest periodic image of each other particle if the image is closer. In the second method, the interaction of a particle with all the images of the other particles, and with the uniform background is taken into account by a technique similar to the Ewald procedure used to calculate lattice sums. It is found that both methods of determining the potential energy yield essentially the same results for the pair distribution function g for Γ values of 10 or less. For larger values of Γ the results given by the two methods differ significantly, indicating that the minimum image convention is inadequate for plasma systems at high densities and low temperatures. Energies and values of the pair distribution function are compared with predictions of various approximate theories for small Γ values. It is found that the nonlinear Debye—Hückel (DH) theory is in agreement with the MC results for values of Γ up to 0.1. At Γ=1.0, significant deviations from the DH theory are observed. For Γ=1.0, g is found to be in close agreement with Carley's calculations based on the Percus—Yevick equation. For values of Γ above 2, g is no longer a monotonic function of the interparticle distance r, but begins to show oscillations characteristic of latticelike structures. For large values of Γ these oscillations are quite pronounced. The system is observed to undergo a fluid—solid phase transition in the vicinity of Γ=125.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1727895

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 690

Metadata

Authors
Brush, S. G., Sahlin, H. L., & Teller, E.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1966-09-15
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
2102-2118
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2036903029
Cited by
690
References
1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monte Carlo Study of a One-Component Plasma. I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1727895
The paper
Brush, S. G., Sahlin, H. L., & Teller, E. (1966). Monte Carlo Study of a One-Component Plasma. I. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1727895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.