Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Note on the Paramagnetic Resonance of Iron in Glass

Castner, Theodore, Newell, George S., Holton, W. C., Slichter, C. P.·1960·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Fe+ + + and Fe+ + ions in glass have been studied by means of paramagnetic resonance. The correlation of the Fe+ + + concentration with an intense resonance at g=4.27 shows the resonance is due to Fe+ + +. A theory is proposed explaining the observed g value and the implications for the atomic surroundings of Fe+ + + are discussed. It is also proposed that the g=6 resonance observed in glass by Sands is due to Fe+ + +.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1730779

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Castner, T., Newell, G. S., Holton, W. C., & Slichter, C. P.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1960-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
668-673
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2073909911
Cited by
561
References
0
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.